2013
DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2013.33.4123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The metric entropy of random dynamical systems in a Hilbert space: Characterization of invariant measures satisfying Pesin's entropy formula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [17], such a partition was constructed by appealing to a lemma due to Mañé [29], and here lies another difference between finite and infinite dimensions: the lemma in [29] uses the finite dimensionality of the ambient manifold. Our next lemma contains a slight strengthening of this result that is adequate for our purposes; see [21] for a similar result. Lemma 6.14 (following Lemma 2 in [29]).…”
Section: Technical Issues Arising From Noninvertibilitymentioning
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [17], such a partition was constructed by appealing to a lemma due to Mañé [29], and here lies another difference between finite and infinite dimensions: the lemma in [29] uses the finite dimensionality of the ambient manifold. Our next lemma contains a slight strengthening of this result that is adequate for our purposes; see [21] for a similar result. Lemma 6.14 (following Lemma 2 in [29]).…”
Section: Technical Issues Arising From Noninvertibilitymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The results in Theorems 1 and 2 were proved in [18], [17] in a finite dimensional context, more precisely for diffeomorphisms of compact Riemannian manifolds, and extended to Hilbert spaces in [21]. In all likelihood, the no zero exponents assumption (H4) is not necessary, but in the presence of zero Lyapunov exponents, the proofs are more elaborate and we have elected to treat that case elsewhere.…”
Section: Statement Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By Theorem 2.5, there is a unique SRB µ i of f n | Λ i for each 1 ≤ i ≤ n, which is mixing. Under the setting of this section, an equivalent statement of Theorem 2.5 is (5.2), for details we refer the reader to [23]. Then, we have that for any 1 ≤ i ≤ n, µ i is the unique measure satisfying…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A consequence of Theorem 2.10 is the following: Let h ν i (f ) be the metric entropy of f with respect to ν i . Then, by applying results from [23] and [24], one obtains the following corollary: Corollary 2.11. For each ergodic attractor (K i , ν i ), letting (λ k , m k ) be its Lyapunov spectrum, one has h ν i (f ) = m k λ + k > 0, and for any ǫ > 0, there exists a horseshoeK i ⊂ K i such that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These techniques to handle the non-uniform compactness of the random attractors will also be useful for estimates of the dimension of K w or further consideration of the Ledrappier-Young formula in infinite-dimensional spaces (cf. [14]), the study of which will enhance the knowledge of chaotic behavior of infinite-dimensional systems, as was pointed out by Eckmann and Ruelle [7] and Young [36]. But it is still not clear how to formulate and verify the integrabillity conditions (1.2) and (1.3) for stochastic differential equations (see [1] for a discussion of this topic).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%