1987
DOI: 10.1016/0022-3913(87)90115-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The microscopic appearance and effect of toothbrushing on extrinsically stained metal-ceramic restorations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these previous research report a more pronounced wear of the antagonist tooth when tested against a fluorapatite veneering ceramic for extrinsic characterization (DC) compared to their control group. Since the nano‐hardness values found on the characterized and control groups were statistically similar, this wear could be related to the roughness of the samples …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Some of these previous research report a more pronounced wear of the antagonist tooth when tested against a fluorapatite veneering ceramic for extrinsic characterization (DC) compared to their control group. Since the nano‐hardness values found on the characterized and control groups were statistically similar, this wear could be related to the roughness of the samples …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Aker et al 7 demonstrated that the use of a normal toothbrush with a common dentifrice could wear away color corrective porcelain stains applied to the surface of feldspathic porcelain restorations in a period of 10 to 12 years unless a protective layer of glaze was applied over the stain. Conversely, Bativala et al 5 found that the extrinsic stain layer on feldspathic porcelain restorations was resistant to significant loss from the use of a fluoride dentifrice applied with a soft multitufted toothbrush for at least 8.5 years of simulated brushing. They also found that some of the stain layer on the The pressable ceramic restorations are fabricated by a combination of the lost-wax and heat-pressing methods, providing excellent marginal fit and esthetic results.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, monolithic restorations without further processing do not meet high aesthetic demands, and therefore, are more often used in the posterior region [2,3]. The staining of ceramic restorations is a common procedure used to mimic the nuances and colors of natural teeth [4][5][6]. To improve the aesthetic limitations of glass-based and polycrystalline ceramics, stain firing was performed on this materials [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%