2021
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2020-0166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mitochondrial genome of Stereolepis doederleini (Pempheriformes: Polyprionidae) and mitogenomic phylogeny of Pempheriformes

Abstract: The complete mitochondrial (mt) genome of Stereolepis doederleini was sequenced from a specimen collected in a commercial aquarium in Jeju Island. The sequence was 16,513 base pairs in length and, similar to other vertebrate mt genomes, included 37 mt genes and a noncoding control region; the gene order was identical to that of typical vertebrate mt genome. Mitochondrial genome sequences of 17 species from 12 families were used to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships within the order P… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 2020 ), and Stereolepis doederleini (MT083886, Oh et al. 2021 ). Amongst, Monodactylus argenteus was selected as the outgroup.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 2020 ), and Stereolepis doederleini (MT083886, Oh et al. 2021 ). Amongst, Monodactylus argenteus was selected as the outgroup.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The earliest fossil Labriformes are species classified as Labridae or pan-labrids that include †Bellwoodilabrus landinii (Bannikov and Carnevale 2010), †Labrobolcus giorgioi (Bannikov and Bellwood 2015), †Eocoris bloti (Bannikov and Sorbini 1990), †Phyllopharyngodon longipinnis (Bellwood 1990), †Zorzinilabrus furcatus (Bannikov and Bellwood 2017), and †Paralabrus rossiae (Bannikov and Zorzin 2019) Li et al 2009;Betancur-R, Broughton, et al 2013;Near et al 2013Near et al , 2015Thacker et al 2015;Davis et al 2016;Sanciangco et al 2016;Betancur-R et al 2017;Mirande 2017;Ghedotti et al 2018;Rabosky et al 2018;Satoh 2018;Oh et al 2021;Ghezelayagh et al 2022;. Phylogenomic studies delimit three major clades of Acropomatiformes (Figure 19): ( 1 Nelson et al 2016:431-463).…”
Section: Synonymsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. Nelson et al 2016:452-453) despite the recognition of appreciable morphological differences with Monodactylus (Tominaga 1968). The traditional delimitation of Acropomatidae (J. S. Nelson et al 2016:434) is not monophyletic (W. L. Smith and Craig 2007;Betancur-R, Broughton, et al 2013;Near et al 2013Near et al , 2015Thacker et al 2015;Davis et al 2016;Sanciangco et al 2016;Mirande 2017;Ghedotti et al 2018;Rabosky et al 2018;Oh et al 2021;Ghezelayagh et al 2022; Composition. There are currently 306 living species of Acropomatiformes (Fricke et al 2023) that include Dinolestes lewini and species classified in Acropomatidae, Banjos, Bathyclupeidae, Champsodon, Creediidae, Epigonidae, Glaucosoma, Hemerocoetidae, Howellidae, Lateolabrax, Malakichthyidae, Ostracoberyx, Pempheridae, Pentacerotidae, Polyprion, Scombrops, Schuettea, Synagropidae, and Symphysanodontidae (W. L. Smith et al 2022).…”
Section: Synonymsmentioning
confidence: 99%