1990
DOI: 10.1080/13854049008401498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The MMPI and neurologic dysfunction: Profile configuration and analysis

Abstract: This study examined the application of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) to the assessment of personality and emotional status in neurologic patients. Eighteen specialists in the clinical neurosciences examined the standard MMPI and indicated those items they felt were potentially tapping valid manifestations of neurologic damage or dysfunction. Forty-four items, loading primarily on the Hs, Hy, and Sc scales, were identified. These items were then deleted from the standard MMPI protocols … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, some results obtained with this instrument are an artefact of test items and scale composition, and cannot be compared with similar results obtained by patients with "functional" psychiatric disorders. We refer here in particular to the fact that many items included in scales Hs (h$pocondriasis), Hy (hysteria) and Sc (schizophrenia) of the MMPI refer to questions that tap valid symptoms or manifestations of brain damage (Lezak, 1983;Alfano, Finlayson, Steams, & Neilson, 1990). High scores on these scales can, therefore, be due either to psychopathological reasons in patients with functional psychiatric disorders or to neurological symptoms in patients with brain injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Second, some results obtained with this instrument are an artefact of test items and scale composition, and cannot be compared with similar results obtained by patients with "functional" psychiatric disorders. We refer here in particular to the fact that many items included in scales Hs (h$pocondriasis), Hy (hysteria) and Sc (schizophrenia) of the MMPI refer to questions that tap valid symptoms or manifestations of brain damage (Lezak, 1983;Alfano, Finlayson, Steams, & Neilson, 1990). High scores on these scales can, therefore, be due either to psychopathological reasons in patients with functional psychiatric disorders or to neurological symptoms in patients with brain injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An important shortcoming in the administration of questionnaires in general in a neurological population is the absence of specific normative data. The applicability of personality questionnaires in neurological patients has been subject of discussion in different studies, and multiple limitations have been described (e.g., Alfano, Finlayson, Stearns, & Neilson, 1990;Alfano, Paniak, & Finlayson, 1993;Bornstein & Kozora, 1990;Glassmire et al, 2003). Many limitations also hold for the administration of the SCL-90-R in this population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, these measures were neither designed with the symptoms of NBD in mind, nor standardized for people with ABI [26]. Subsequent attempts have been made to modify existing measures in an attempt to increase their validity, including the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) [34,35]. Perhaps the best known adaptation is the Neurobehavioral Rating Scale (NRS) [36], which is a modified version of the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.…”
Section: Measurement Of Neurobehavioural Disabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%