The Modified Delphi Technique - A Rotational Modification

Custer, Rodney L.; Scarcella, Joseph A.; Stewart, Bob R.

doi:10.21061/jcte.v15i2.702

Cited by 350 publications

(295 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

286

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…One modification to the Delphi process involves beginning the first round with 1 or more carefully selected items. 28 For this study, an initial definition for the phrase "advocacy for a profession" was used, based on a synthesized review of the literature.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Consensus Definition and Core Competencies for Being an Advocate for Pharmacy

Bzowyckyj

Janke

2013

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To develop a consensus definition for "advocacy for the profession of pharmacy" and core competencies for doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) graduates to be effective advocates for the profession. Methods. A 3-round modified Delphi process was conducted using a panel of 9 experts. Participants revised a definition for "advocacy for the profession" and ultimately rated their agreement using a 5-point Likert scale. Competency statements were developed and subsequently rated for importance for being an advocate and importance to address in PharmD curricula. Results. A consensus-derived definition was developed. Two competency statements achieved consensus for both measures of importance. Four competency statements achieved consensus for only 1 measure and another 4 did not reach consensus for either measure. Conclusion. A consensus-derived definition was developed describing advocacy for the profession of pharmacy and began laying the groundwork for the knowledge and skills necessary to be an effective advocate for the profession of pharmacy.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Consensus Definition and Core Competencies for Being an Advocate for Pharmacy

Bzowyckyj

Janke

2013

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In this way, the Delphi technique converges on individual opinions through a repetitive process. There is no set number of iterations for consensus, and the iteration continuous until there is consensus, but three iterations are sufficient in many cases [25][26][27][28]. Consensus was also reached through three iterations in this study.…”

Section: Delphi Techniquementioning

confidence: 96%

Sustainable Development Plan for Korea through Expansion of Green IT: Policy Issues for the Effective Utilization of Big Data

Baek¹,

Park

2015

Sustainability

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The South Korean government is providing full support for green IT as one of the growth engines of Korea. The purpose of this study is to derive policy issues needed for the sustainable development of Korea through utilizing Big Data by applying green IT. The analysis is done using a Delphi technique. Results show that the establishment of computing platforms that can easily share data and generate value is prioritized for the effective use of Big Data from the environment. In addition, the government-led publication of genetic information and electronic medical records for research purposes has been derived as an important policy issue for the use of bio-Big Data. Besides, a guideline concerning the standardization of machine to machine and Internet of Things communication and data security is needed to effectively use Big Data from machines/things. Moreover, a review of legislation related to the utilization of Big Data from digital media has been derived as an important policy issue. The results of this study propose the direction in which the Korean government should move for green growth through effective utilization of Big Data. The results can be also useful resources for establishing relevant policies for various countries that are accelerating sustainable development.

show abstract

“…(4) Lastly, the JLA suggests that the final prioritysetting process be conducted using face-to-face workshops with clinicians and patients. Instead, we used a computerized Delphi process [33][34][35][36] to rank priorities until the final list was obtained. This allows for greater participation by a wider group of patients and clinicians.…”

Section: Design and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Researching what matters to improve chronic pain care in Canada: A priority-setting partnership process to support patient-oriented research

Poulin

Shergill

Romanow

et al. 2018

Canadian Journal of Pain

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Chronic pain affects more than 6 million Canadians. Patients need to be involved in setting research priorities to ensure a focus on areas important to those who will be most impacted by the results. Aims The aim of this study was to leverage patient experiences to identify chronic pain research priorities in Canada. Method The process was informed by the James Lind Alliance. After gathering an exhaustive list of questions using surveys, town hall meetings, interviews, and social media consultations, we used a computerized Delphi with four successive iterations to select the final list of research priorities. The final Delphi round was conducted by a panel of ten patients living with chronic pain and ten clinicians from different disciplines. Results We received more than 5000 suggestions from 1500 people. The Delphi process led to the identification of 14 questions fitting under the following 4 themes: (1) improving knowledge and competencies in chronic pain; (2) improving patient-centered chronic pain care; (3) preventing chronic pain and reducing associated symptoms; and (4) improving access to and coordination of patient-centered chronic pain care. Challenges included the issue of chronic pain being ubiquitous to many diseases, leading to many initial suggestions focusing on these diseases. We also identified the need for further engagement efforts with marginalized groups in order to validate the priorities identified or identify different sets of priorities specific to these groups. Conclusion The priorities identified can guide patient-oriented chronic pain research to ultimately improve the care offered to people living with chronic pain.

show abstract

The Modified Delphi Technique - A Rotational Modification

Cited by 350 publications

References 1 publication

A Consensus Definition and Core Competencies for Being an Advocate for Pharmacy

A Consensus Definition and Core Competencies for Being an Advocate for Pharmacy

Sustainable Development Plan for Korea through Expansion of Green IT: Policy Issues for the Effective Utilization of Big Data

Researching what matters to improve chronic pain care in Canada: A priority-setting partnership process to support patient-oriented research

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About