2019
DOI: 10.5455/jpma.293708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The modified Robson criteria for caesarean section audit at MCH Center PIMS Islamabad

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Our CS rate was lower than the study at PIMS Hospital Islamabad (80.3%). 13 Our CS rate of Group-5 was much lower than studies carried out at Peru (81%) 14 and Ghana (71%). 15 The variation in CS rates in different hospitals must be due to different approaches, expertise available, common risk factor, facilities available and interpretation of findings.…”
Section: A H E a D O F P R I N Tcontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…12 Our CS rate was lower than the study at PIMS Hospital Islamabad (80.3%). 13 Our CS rate of Group-5 was much lower than studies carried out at Peru (81%) 14 and Ghana (71%). 15 The variation in CS rates in different hospitals must be due to different approaches, expertise available, common risk factor, facilities available and interpretation of findings.…”
Section: A H E a D O F P R I N Tcontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…Our findings are in keeping with studies in tertiary hospitals in India and Pakistan in which a majority of the pregnant women who had a CS were those in Group 5. [ 20 21 ] Similarly, the secondary analysis of two WHO multi-country surveys in 2015 revealed that in countries with low Human Development Index like Nigeria, women in Group 5 had the highest caesarean rate. [ 22 ] However, a study in Egypt that analysed the CSR using the standard 10-Group Robson classification system revealed that women in Groups 5, 6, and 10 had the highest caesarean rates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different to our findings, Khan MA et al 11 in another local research observed Group-5 and Group-2 to be the most common. Gilani S et al 18 found Group-, Group-5 and Group-1 to be the commonest groups showing 30.7%, 17.1% and 21.4% cases respectively. Dhodapkar SB et al 19 from India was found to have Group-1, Group-5 and Group-2 as the most prevalent groups accounting for 33.3%, 19.7% and 14.6% cases respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%