1957
DOI: 10.2739/kurumemedj.4.53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Modifying Effects of Bacterial Substances in the Course of Infection With Neurotropic Virus

Abstract: The investigation of Shope (1) concerning the etiology of the swine influenza may be the first experiment on the interaction between a virus and a bacterium. Shope discovered that the disease was caused by a symbiosis of the bacillus, H. influenzae suis, and a virus, i.e, the bacillus alone would not produce the disease; the virus alone produced an extremely mild, but spontaneously transmissible infection. Both agents were needed to reproduce the clinical syndrome. Horsf all and McCarty (2) reported a study on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1957
1957
1957
1957

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GDVII strain of mouse encephalomyelitis virus as described in the previous report (1) was employed.…”
Section: Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The GDVII strain of mouse encephalomyelitis virus as described in the previous report (1) was employed.…”
Section: Virusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The E. coli was selected among the bacteria having inhibitory effect described in the previous reports (1) (2), and the experiments concerning the inhibitory effect of E. coli on the GDVII strain of mouse encephalomyelitis virus (GDVII virus) were investigated in detail (3) (4). The results obtained were the :following data: the administration with E. coli before virus inoculation was effective on the inhibition of the infection with the GDVII virus, but when the E. coli was given to the mice following the virus infection the effect of the bacteria was not evident ; it was most significant in the case of the same route of administration with the bacteria and the virus; the bacteria itself had not direct virucidal activity ; the effect of the bacteria was not related with the antibody against this bacteria; and no evidence of inapparent infection in the survival mice was presented.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%