2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2010.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The molecular therapy of colorectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that HIPK1 directly phophorylates p53, even if it cannot be excluded that another factor or a multiprotein complex is required for this event to occur. 10,12,13 This interaction with p53 is also shared by two is specifically activated in pre-malignant CRC lesions, of which some are particularly prone to genetic instability, 43 in order to delay cell division. We show here that, like ATM, HIPK1 is suddenly overexpressed during the initial phases of cancer development and is able to phosphorylate p53 serine 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that HIPK1 directly phophorylates p53, even if it cannot be excluded that another factor or a multiprotein complex is required for this event to occur. 10,12,13 This interaction with p53 is also shared by two is specifically activated in pre-malignant CRC lesions, of which some are particularly prone to genetic instability, 43 in order to delay cell division. We show here that, like ATM, HIPK1 is suddenly overexpressed during the initial phases of cancer development and is able to phosphorylate p53 serine 15.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the main obstacle to successful treatment of this disease, as in the other solid tumors, is presented by drug resistance. Looking at the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon, several reports have described the close relationship between genetic stability of the tumor and the selective pressure of the tumor microenvironment (2). This explains why many biomarkers capable of predicting the response to chemotherapy are linked to pathways of cell survival that are activated as adaptive response in stressing microenvironments (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Based on the good clinical compliance and the findings of several research groups that revealed K-ras mutations in stools consistent with the K-ras status in matching Chip-based detection of stool K-ras mutation H Zhang et al tumor tissues, [28][29][30] mutated DNA in stools has become the latest target of several detection methods. [8][9][10] Although stoolbased DNA detection could report CRC tissue K-ras genotypes faithfully, severe difficulties because of complicated procedures and low sensitivity have hampered further progress in using stool samples to detect K-ras mutations and preventatively screen for CRC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constitutively activating mutations in K-ras, particularly at 'limited hot spot' codons 12 and 13, may lead to uncontrolled cell proliferation and may render tumor cells independent of EGFR signaling and thereby resistant to EGFR-targeted therapies. [4][5][6] An American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) provisional clinical opinion (PCO) has addressed the utility of K-ras gene mutation testing in patients with metastatic CRC to predict the response to anti-EGFR therapy with cetuximab or panitumumab. 7 Therefore, it is of the utmost importance to screen and assess these patients for K-ras status to guide personalized medicine and to avoid the application of costly drugs that would only cause toxic side effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%