2007
DOI: 10.1002/zaac.200700125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Monomerization of a Binuclear Molybdenum(VI) Dioxo Complex by an Unusual Silylation Reaction

Abstract: The formation of a mononuclear molybdenum(VI) complex [MoO2{O(CH2)2S(CH2)2OH}(OSiButPh2)] (2) derived from its binuclear precursor [MoO2{O(CH2)2S(CH2)2O}]2 (1) by a silylation reaction accompanied by the conversion of methanol to chloromethane is reported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…two oxygen atoms at 1.870(15) Å, which were assigned to “surface siloxide ligands”. These bond lengths for the MoO and Mo–O bonds are in the range of those observed for bis-oxo siloxy Mo molecular complexes (Table S1 in the Supporting Information). Similar parameters were obtained when fitting the k 2 ·χ­( k ) spectrum. The fit could be improved by adding a layer of further backscatterers with approximately one oxygen and two silicon atoms at 2.39(4) and 3.27(5) Å, respectively, due to a surface oxygen atom from a siloxane bridge of the silica support and the silicon atoms of the surface siloxide ligands.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…two oxygen atoms at 1.870(15) Å, which were assigned to “surface siloxide ligands”. These bond lengths for the MoO and Mo–O bonds are in the range of those observed for bis-oxo siloxy Mo molecular complexes (Table S1 in the Supporting Information). Similar parameters were obtained when fitting the k 2 ·χ­( k ) spectrum. The fit could be improved by adding a layer of further backscatterers with approximately one oxygen and two silicon atoms at 2.39(4) and 3.27(5) Å, respectively, due to a surface oxygen atom from a siloxane bridge of the silica support and the silicon atoms of the surface siloxide ligands.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 66%
“…To further support our proposed mechanism, we note that oxo silylation is a well-established transformation. Moreover, HN­(SiMe 3 ) 2 is well known to act as a [SiMe 3 ] + source. With that said, unactivated uranyl is not known to undergo silylation with such a weakly electrophilic silyl source, suggesting that the coordination of the tripodal silsesquioxane ligand to the uranyl ion activates the uranyl ion toward oxo silylation. This activation may be a consequence of some O yl –U–O yl bending upon ligation of the silsesquioxane, which increases the O yl nucleophilicity. In this regard, the reaction of the tripodal TREN ligand, [Li] 3 [N­(CH 2 CH 2 NR) 3 ] (R = Si t BuMe 2 ), with uranyl resulted in the isolation of an oxo substitution product, [{UO­(μ-NCH 2 CH 2 N­(CH 2 CH 2 NR) 2 )} 2 ] − , which was hypothesized to form via a reactive cis -uranyl intermediate .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The Mo VI –O phenol , Mo VI –O oxo , and Mo VI –S bond lengths span the ranges of 2.102(12)–2.183(13), 1.712(13)–1.782(13), and 2.732(5)-2.744(5) Å, respectively. Although MoSO 5 geometry was observed in some Mo-based compounds, most previously reported examples have only one or two of five O atoms as the terminal oxo group (Table S1). After the metalation of TC4A 4– using Mo VI , MoO 3 –TC4A possesses more oxo groups, thereby exerting a similar role to an anion template by forming Ag–O bonds.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%