Discursive Disruption, Populist Communication and Democracy 2022
DOI: 10.4324/9781003118602-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The moral language of populist communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamics of political fandom and fan antagonism may even exacerbate social polarization (Mason, 2018). Memes have also been identified with a broader populist style embraced by new far-right globally (Atton, 2006; Baldwin-Philippi, 2019; Block and Negrine, 2017). Memes’ amateur aesthetic can be part of the technological performance of populism that antagonizes the political establishment (Baldwin-Philippi, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamics of political fandom and fan antagonism may even exacerbate social polarization (Mason, 2018). Memes have also been identified with a broader populist style embraced by new far-right globally (Atton, 2006; Baldwin-Philippi, 2019; Block and Negrine, 2017). Memes’ amateur aesthetic can be part of the technological performance of populism that antagonizes the political establishment (Baldwin-Philippi, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have envisioned populism as a specific style of communication or rhetoric characterized by several traits ( Block and Negrine, 2017 ; Bracciale and Martella, 2017 ; Norris and Inglehart, 2019 ). Populism is fundamentally defined by the use of antagonistic discourse to present a “thin–centered” ideology that “considers society to be ultimately separated into two homogeneous and antagonistic groups, ‘the pure people’ versus ‘the corrupt elite’” ( Mudde, 2004 : 543).…”
Section: Of Populism and Permanent Campaigningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, what unites these definitions is their agreement on the fact that what unites populist political actors from the wide range of the political spectrumboth from leftist and rightist partiesdespite their ideological differences is a certain way of communication. Building on four prominent definitions by Block and Negrine (2017), by Jagers and Walgrave (2007), by Weyland (2017) and by Moffitt (2016), as for the aims of this research, we conclude populism to be: a strategic style of political communication that is characterized by an appeal to the people and a simultaneous exclusion of an ‗other' (whose identity depends on the goal of the populist actor, but it is usually the elite or certain out-groups) expressed via a style of communication that can be defined as adversarial and abrasive, displaying ‗bad manners'. Populist discourse often builds on the topics of crisis, breakdown and threat (Körösényi 2019;Moffitt 2015;Moffitt 2016).…”
Section: Contemporary Populismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This setting favors populist communication, as features of the populist style (e.g. the simplification of complex issues) correspond well with media logic (Block -Negrine 2017). Politics are becoming popular, in which self-mediatization and spectacularization are crucial processes.…”
Section: The Era Of Contemporary Politicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation