2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“The More Things Change, The More They Stay the Same”: Path dependency, sports content, and the suppression of innovation in mobile television

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our present understanding of consumer use of mobile data is informed by a trio of inquiries initiated by Hutchins (2014Hutchins ( , 2016aHutchins ( , 2016b. Hutchins (2014) originally discussed the shifting nature of sport consumption, notably the instantaneous access of content and the impact it would have on distribution to the consumer.…”
Section: Review Of Literature and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our present understanding of consumer use of mobile data is informed by a trio of inquiries initiated by Hutchins (2014Hutchins ( , 2016aHutchins ( , 2016b. Hutchins (2014) originally discussed the shifting nature of sport consumption, notably the instantaneous access of content and the impact it would have on distribution to the consumer.…”
Section: Review Of Literature and Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a sense of inertia and ‘path dependency’ (Hutchins, 2016) has been highlighted in the preceding discussion, some degree of digital disruption seems inevitable. Despite the noted resistance, if new digital platforms are going to take off, sport is likely to be a significant catalyst in the process given its socio-cultural resonance as a convenient launching pad to disperse technology; the implementation of satellite television in the US being one example (Turner, 2007).…”
Section: The Future Of Sport Digital Rightsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are differences between media systems and rights regimes in Australia and the United States, the similarities between Aereo and TV Now are such that legal scholars have compared them directly (Foong, 2015), while others have written about both cases at length in separate articles (Giblin, 2012a(Giblin, , 2012bGiblin & Ginsburg, 2014. For those interested in the details of the Australian case that ran over the course of almost a year in 2011 and 2012, we recommend consultation with these sources and media studies commentaries that critically assess the implications of the court decisions and their news coverage for "mobile media sport" (Hutchins, 2014(Hutchins, , 2016.…”
Section: Part Iv: International Parallelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the control of intellectual property and enforcement of copyright are vital sources of market power and corporate wealth for sports leagues and television networks, particularly when faced by potentially disruptive technological innovations and competitors (Evens, Iosifidis, & Smith, 2013). Second, Aereo is symptomatic of the legal and regulatory complications presented by new cloud-based mobile television services and storage systems, which is a phenomenon that can be observed internationally (Flew, Suzor, & Liu, 2013;Hutchins, 2016). These factors coalesce to ensure that market-dominant leagues and television networks deploy significant resources to maintain control over the distribution of popular sports content and influence the parameters of news coverage and public opinion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%