The Motivation and Pleasure Scale–Self-Report (MAP-SR): Reliability and validity of a self-report measure of negative symptoms

Llerena, Katiah; Park, Stephanie G.; McCarthy, Julie M.; Couture, Shannon M.; Bennett, Melanie E.; Blanchard, Jack J.

doi:10.1016/j.comppsych.2012.12.001

Cited by 158 publications

(112 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

107

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Llerena et al [10] demonstrated an excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.90) and moderate convergent validity between patient (MAP-SR) and clinician (CAINS) ratings of motivation and pleasure (r = 0.65). This is contrary to the results reported by Selten et al [14] on the discrepancy between patient and clinician ratings using the SENS and the SANS, and by Kring et al [2] on the lack of agreement between the CAINS and the selfreport measures of pleasure and motivation (see the CAINS section).…”

Section: The Motivation and Pleasure Scale: Self-report (Map-sr)mentioning

confidence: 95%

“…Based on our classification of negative instruments [5], the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale [6], the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms [7], the Subjective Experience of Negative Symptoms [8] and the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [9] belong to the first generation, while the Brief Negative Symptom Scale [3], the Clinical Assessment Interview for Negative Symptoms [2] and the Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self-Report [10] belong to the second generation. The Negative Symptom Assessment [11] can be considered a transitional instrument between the two, as it better covers the negative syndrome and relies less on behaviours and performance when scoring than do the firstgeneration instruments.…”

Section: First-versus Second-generation Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The items are grouped into four subscales (social pleasure, recreational or work pleasure, feelings and motivations about close, caring relationships, and motivation and effort to engage in activities) [10]. As with the CAINS and the BNSS, both types of pleasureconsummatory and anticipatory'-are assessed.…”

Section: The Motivation and Pleasure Scale: Self-report (Map-sr)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Psychometric evaluation of the negative syndrome of schizophrenia

García-Portilla

Álvarez

Sáiz

et al. 2015

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we reviewed the available instruments for assessing the negative syndrome of schizophrenia, describing their strengths and weaknesses. Current instruments were classified into two categories according to their content validity and assessment approach as first- or second-generation instruments. The BPRS, SANS, the SENS and the PANSS belong to the first generation, while the BNSS, the CAINS and the MAP-SR belong to the second generation. The NSA can be considered a transitional instrument between the two. First-generation instruments have more content validity problems than second-generation instruments do, as they do not accurately reflect the currently accepted negative syndrome (they do not include all negative symptoms and signs or they include symptoms from other dimensions). They also have more problems relative to the use of behavioural referents instead of internal experiences of deficits when assessing symptoms, which may lead to measuring functioning instead of negative symptoms. Further research needs to be done in this area in order to ensure the evaluation of primary negative symptoms and internal experiences involved in negative symptoms rather than external behaviours.

show abstract

Section: The Motivation and Pleasure Scale: Self-report (Map-sr)mentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: First-versus Second-generation Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: The Motivation and Pleasure Scale: Self-report (Map-sr)mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Psychometric evaluation of the negative syndrome of schizophrenia

García-Portilla

Álvarez

Sáiz

et al. 2015

Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More recently, Llerena and colleagues (2013) developed the Motivation and Pleasure Scale-Self Report (MAP-SR) to measure negative symptoms in schizophrenia (LLerena et al, 2013). The MAP-SR contains 15 questions across four domains: social pleasure, recreational or work pleasure, feelings and motivations about close, caring relationships, motivation and effort to engage in activities.…”

Section: Clinical Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing anhedonia in depression: Potentials and pitfalls

Rizvi

Pizzagalli

Sproule

et al. 2016

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

420

301

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The resurgence of interest in anhedonia within major depression has been fuelled by clinical trials demonstrating its utility in predicting antidepressant response as well as recent conceptualizations focused on the role and manifestation of anhedonia in depression. Historically, anhedonia has been conceptualized as a “loss of pleasure”, yet neuropsychological and neurobiological studies reveal a multifaceted reconceptualization that emphasizes different facets of hedonic function, including desire, effort/motivation, anticipation and consummatory pleasure. To ensure generalizability across studies, evaluation of the available subjective and objective methods to assess anhedonia is necessary. The majority of research regarding anhedonia and its neurobiological underpinnings comes from preclinical research, which uses primary reward (e.g. food) to probe hedonic responding. In contrast, behavioural studies in humans primarily use secondary reward (e.g. money) to measure many aspects of reward responding, including delay discounting, response bias, prediction error, probabilistic reversal learning, effort, anticipation and consummatory pleasure. The development of subjective scales to measure anhedonia has also increased in the last decade. This review will assess the current methodology to measure anhedonia, with a focus on scales and behavioural tasks in humans. Limitations of current work and recommendations for future studies are discussed.

show abstract

“…The 22-item MPQ-SC reflects the following characteristics: sociable, values close relationships, warm/affectionate, and welcomes support. The MPQ-SC has been shown to have high internal consistency (i.e., alphas above .80) and good convergent validity (Aday and Cornelius, 2006; Llerena et al, 2013). …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The interactive effects of negative symptoms and social role functioning on suicide ideation in individuals with schizophrenia

Jahn

Bennett

Park

et al. 2016

Schizophrenia Research

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Findings regarding the protective effect of social role functioning on suicide ideation in individuals with schizophrenia have been mixed. One reason for such inconsistencies in the literature may be that individuals with prominent negative symptoms of schizophrenia may not experience a desire for social closeness, and therefore social role functioning may not influence suicide risk in these individuals. The aim of this study was to examine the moderating effects of self-reported desire for social closeness and interviewer-rated negative symptoms on the relationship between social role functioning and suicide ideation. Our sample consisted of 162 individuals who had been diagnosed with schizophrenia-spectrum disorders; all participants completed self-report questionnaires and clinician-administered interviews, and moderation hypotheses were tested with a non-parametric procedure. The results indicated that motivation and pleasure-related negative symptoms moderated the relationship between social role functioning and suicide ideation; self-reported desire for social closeness and negative symptoms related to expression did not have such a moderating effect. Specifically, better social role functioning was associated with less suicide ideation only in those individuals who had low motivation and pleasure-related negative symptoms; no significant relationship was observed between social role functioning and suicide ideation among those with elevated motivation and pleasure-related negative symptoms. These findings suggest that assessing for negative symptoms and social role functioning may inform suicide risk assessments in individuals with schizophrenia, and improving social role functioning may reduce suicide ideation among those with few motivation and pleasure-related negative symptoms.

show abstract

The Motivation and Pleasure Scale–Self-Report (MAP-SR): Reliability and validity of a self-report measure of negative symptoms

Cited by 158 publications

References 30 publications

Psychometric evaluation of the negative syndrome of schizophrenia

Psychometric evaluation of the negative syndrome of schizophrenia

Assessing anhedonia in depression: Potentials and pitfalls

The interactive effects of negative symptoms and social role functioning on suicide ideation in individuals with schizophrenia

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About