1932
DOI: 10.1002/jez.1400610107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The movement of pigment within the chromatophores of Palaemonetes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1935
1935
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented in Figures 1 and 2 showing that some eyestalk extracts produced only dispersion of the white pigment while others produced only concentration provide an explanation for the apparently inconsonant reports of Perkins and Snook (1932) who, as stated above, reported on the one hand that eyestalk extracts caused dispersion of the white pigment of Palacmonctcs and of Brown (1935) and Hanstrom (1937) on the other who reported that these extracts caused concentration. It is conceivable that by chance alone these investigators obtained eyestalks which showed only one effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results presented in Figures 1 and 2 showing that some eyestalk extracts produced only dispersion of the white pigment while others produced only concentration provide an explanation for the apparently inconsonant reports of Perkins and Snook (1932) who, as stated above, reported on the one hand that eyestalk extracts caused dispersion of the white pigment of Palacmonctcs and of Brown (1935) and Hanstrom (1937) on the other who reported that these extracts caused concentration. It is conceivable that by chance alone these investigators obtained eyestalks which showed only one effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Examination of the literature dealing with the leucophores of the prawn, Palaemonetes vulgaris, reveals that Perkins and Snook (1932) reported that the eyestalks of this organism contain a substance which causes dispersion of its white chromatophoric pigment whereas later Brown (1935) and Hanstrom (1937) using the same species came to the opposite conclusion, namely that the eyestalk contains a white pigment-concentrating substance. Both Brown and Hanstrom suggested that dispersion of the white pigment was due to absence of the pigmentconcentrating substance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…71) and 8). Perkins and Snook ( 1932) investigated the movement of the red carotenoprotein pigment in chromatophores of the prawn Palacinonctes. They found the red pigment to be granular in nature and suggested that the "granules and the protoplasmic medium in which they are carried flow out into collapsed tubes which are the walls of the branched chromatophore, fixed in position, and lying in tissue spaces."…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chromatophores of Palaemonetes spp. have been studied extensively in the past with regard to the factors involved in pigment migration in crustaceans (Perkins and Snook, 1932;Brown, 1935;Brown, Webb, and Sandeen, 1952;Fingerman and Tinkle, 1956;Fingerman, 1978, 1979). The first of these chromatophores develop in the embryo and are easily observed through the transparent chorion (Glas et al, 1997, Romney andReiber, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%