1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf00264581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The multiple phase service network with generalized processor sharing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
174
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classical papers include [4], [9], [1], [11], and [5]; see [12] for a textbook treatment. Recent interesting papers are [3] and [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classical papers include [4], [9], [1], [11], and [5]; see [12] for a textbook treatment. Recent interesting papers are [3] and [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to insensitivity results for networks of generalized processor sharing queues, as was shown by Cohen [5].…”
Section: General Think-time and File-size Distributions For Large Bufmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…(3) results in the expression given in Eq. (2). The corresponding expression for s j min can be obtained by substituting n j π * into Eq.…”
Section: Variance-based Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming that each user has equal rights or priority to the resource, a hypothetical service discipline that is fair is a bit-by-bit round-robin (BR) discipline, since at every instant in time, each user is receiving its fair share. For users that can be characterized as jobs (e.g., in a supermarket set-up), the Processor-sharing model (introduced in [1] and generalized in [2]) is commonly used to evaluate the efficiency of the BR discipline as the bit size tends to zero. Recently, a resource-allocation queueing fairness measure (RAQFM) has been proposed in [3] that accounts for both seniority differences (times of arrival) and service-time differences (job sizes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%