In the 50 years since the first determination of the structures of proteins, our understanding of the states that they adopt in solution has enormously improved.1 It is now well-established that proteins populate a wide variety of different states in solution, many of which are conformationally highly heterogeneous. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Even in their native states, proteins constantly undergo structural fluctuations on time scales ranging from picoseconds to seconds and beyond. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] It is therefore indispensable to achieve an accurate description of the inherent protein dynamics in order to account for biologically relevant processes, including enzymatic activity 6,9,10 and the formation of biomolecular complexes. 8,11 This goal is challenging, especially with respect to the treatment of dynamical regions of proteins, such as loop or unstructured sections, which often play important biological roles. A powerful strategy for characterizing the structure and dynamics of proteins in solution is emerging from methodsthatcombineNMRandmoleculardynamicssimulations. 5,8,12,13 Although these methods have offered encouraging results, it is still unclear whether they can provide ensembles of structures with the correct equilibrium statistical weights.Here we address this fundamental question by showing that molecular dynamics simulations with ensemble-averaged restraints 5,12,13 serve as a very accurate tool for calculating the free energies associated with the equilibrium ensembles corresponding to the native states of proteins. We adopted an approach in which AMBER 14 molecular dynamics simulations of ubiquitin are used to generate a collection of structures, forming a reference ensemble representing the state of the protein in solution. NMR observables are then back-calculated from this ensemble and used as restraints in CHARMM 5,12 molecular dynamics simulations aimed at reconstructing the distribution of structures of the reference ensemble. Approaches using reference ensembles have proved to be very powerful in structural biology 12,15 since they allow for an objective cross-validation analysis in which the atomic coordinates of the conformations to be reconstructed are known exactly; thus, both the average structure and the structural heterogeneity obtained from the restrained simulations can be compared with great accuracy to those of the reference ensemble. To define a reference representation of the ubiquitin solution ensemble, we employed the AMBER99SB force field, 16 which has been shown to accurately reproduce the native-state dynamics of ubiquitin; 14 a comparison of the referenceensemble-calculated and experimentally measured S 2 order parameters and residual dipolar couplings (RDCs) is presented in Figure S1 in the Supporting Information. As structural restraints, we employed RDCs, 17 which are particularly suitable for probing protein structure and dynamics with sensitivity up to the millisecond time scale. 8,13,18,19 We extracted 36 reference RDC data sets from the reference ensemble...