1996
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.25.14800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The mutation rate and cancer

Abstract: The selection of advantageous mutations underlies tumorigenesis. The growth of a tumor is therefore a form of evolution at the somatic level, in which the population is comprised of individual cells within the tumor. Models of tumorigenesis have considered the relative importance of mutation and selection. We show that selection is more important than an increased mutation rate in the growth of a tumor. Some cancers may acquire a ''mutator phenotype,'' probably leading to faster growth, but mutator phenotypes … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
253
1
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 430 publications
(273 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
16
253
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of both oncogenes and house‐keeping genes have been widely assessed, and we take them to be about NR140 (Vogelstein et al., 2013) and NnormalHK3804 (Eisenberg & Levanon, 2013), respectively. Interestingly enough, considering small replication effects for δR, such experimental values produce an adaptive landscape (Figure 2) that has a positive gradient within the region of μ[109,104], so that our evolutionary trajectories will be bounded within a region of instability levels in accordance with those experimentally measured for tumour cells (Tomlinson, Novelli, & Bodmer, 1996). …”
Section: Selection On Instabilitysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The number of both oncogenes and house‐keeping genes have been widely assessed, and we take them to be about NR140 (Vogelstein et al., 2013) and NnormalHK3804 (Eisenberg & Levanon, 2013), respectively. Interestingly enough, considering small replication effects for δR, such experimental values produce an adaptive landscape (Figure 2) that has a positive gradient within the region of μ[109,104], so that our evolutionary trajectories will be bounded within a region of instability levels in accordance with those experimentally measured for tumour cells (Tomlinson, Novelli, & Bodmer, 1996). …”
Section: Selection On Instabilitysupporting
confidence: 66%
“…Mutations rarely occur in normal cells and the probability that a single cell will accumulate multiple mutations is extremely low (Loeb, 1991). However, like the clonal succession of tumor progression, which increases the probability of further hits because more cells are at risk (Tomlinson et al, 1996), alteration followed by niche succession may also expedite further progression because multiple stem cells are present in a niche. A 'consensus' tag is 10100111 for crypt 1 and 00001000 for crypt 2.…”
Section: Implications Of Stem Cell Niches To Tumor Progressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And phenotypic variation of normal cells by conventional gene mutation cells is limited to 10 Ϫ7 per cell generation for dominant genes and to 10 Ϫ14 for pairs of recessive genes in all species [6,47,52,57,68,69]. Even the mutation rates of most cancers are not higher than those of normal cells [6,19,20,47,66,[70][71][72][73][74][75]. Thus, phenotypic variation in cancer cells can be four to eleven orders faster than conventional mutation.…”
Section: Karyotype-phenotype Variations At Rates That Are Orders Highmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples are the 'high rates', compared to mutation, at which some cancers generate metastatic cells [59,60], or generate drug-resistant variants [53,54,56,58]. But the mutation rates of most cancers are not higher than those of normal cells [6,19,20,47,66,[70][71][72][73][74]. 6 Heritable Cancer Genes, but no Heritable Cancer.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%