2001
DOI: 10.7551/mitpress/4833.001.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Myth of the Paperless Office

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
519
1
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 488 publications
(542 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
519
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…These properties are related to the properties of the physical paper that have been studied and noticed by many researchers during the last two decades [62,47,73,48,56]. Furthermore, the participants improved navigation by manipulating the pages such as folding corners, marking pages, or making annotations in the paper guide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These properties are related to the properties of the physical paper that have been studied and noticed by many researchers during the last two decades [62,47,73,48,56]. Furthermore, the participants improved navigation by manipulating the pages such as folding corners, marking pages, or making annotations in the paper guide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sellen and Harper (2001), for example, found that paper artifacts have important roles in office work (e.g., supporting collaboration). Further, four key properties of paper that support the flexible interweaving of reading and writing were identified [62]. First, the paper is physically flexible.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hartson (2003) extended the concept's domain by distinguishing cognitive, physical, sensory, and functional affordances. For example, paper has many different affordances, especially in combination with other technologies (such as pens or thumbtacks), supporting a wide variety of human actions (Sellen and Harper, 2003). Paper documents allow readers to make notes or other marks on them, allow flexible navigation and manipulation, allow users to position or lay out the paper for different purposes, view material in much greater resolution than on-screen, are tangible (involving hands, eyes, and varying position), facilitate the coordination of action among organizational members, provide a medium for information gathering and exchange, support discussion, allow annotation for later discussion, provide a medium for organizing one's thoughts and work processes, and enable storage of information for multiple people, groups, locations, and time periods.…”
Section: Communication Modes Media Richness and Affordancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a vertical display for group interaction tends to create an authorial atmosphere, with someone controlling the display as a teacher or lecturer; however, horizontal tabletop displays "provide a natural centre for interaction to take place around and encourages collaboration between the users" (Stahl and Wallberg, 2004, p. 53). The location and formatting of office paper (such as binders, or Post-It notes) can signal whether someone should attend to it quickly or whether it can be shared (Sellen and Harper, 2003). Longterm use of video-mediated communication can foster complex patterns of interaction constrained by the features and structures of the new medium (Dourish et al, 1996).…”
Section: Effect Of System Design On Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%