2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0278-5846(03)00169-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The N200 abnormalities of auditory event-related potentials in patients with panic disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, Turan, Esel, Karaaslan, Basturk, Oguz, and Yabanoglu (2002) reported a significant prolongation of P300 latency in a panic disorder group using an auditory oddball paradigm without any differences for earlier components. Moreover, Wang, Miyazato, Randall, Hokama, Hiramatsu, and Ogura (2003) found a reduction of the N200 component in female subjects suffering from panic disorder during an active discrimination task, and no differences for the P300 component were described between patients and controls.…”
Section: Panic Disordermentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Conversely, Turan, Esel, Karaaslan, Basturk, Oguz, and Yabanoglu (2002) reported a significant prolongation of P300 latency in a panic disorder group using an auditory oddball paradigm without any differences for earlier components. Moreover, Wang, Miyazato, Randall, Hokama, Hiramatsu, and Ogura (2003) found a reduction of the N200 component in female subjects suffering from panic disorder during an active discrimination task, and no differences for the P300 component were described between patients and controls.…”
Section: Panic Disordermentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Oddball N2 reflects the detection of a mismatch within a stimulus stream (Folstein and van Petten, 2008). Although reduced oddball N2 amplitude in PD was previously reported (Wang et al, 2003), the small number of patients showing that ERP abnormality renders the finding unreliable. Interpretations of P2 include attentional modulation of nontarget stimuli (Novak et al, 1992) and stimulus classification (GarciaLarrea et al, 1992), and the component is believed to represent a functionally discrete stage of neural processing (Crowley and Colrain, 2004).…”
Section: N2 and P2mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Iwanami et al (1997) additionally found increased N1 to relevant oddball stimuli (infrequent targets), which correlated with self-reported state anxiety in PD, suggesting a contribution of cortical arousal. In contrast, other investigators reported no group effect for N1 (e.g., Clark et al, 1996;Wang et al, 2003). Increased P3a to rare target and distractor tones within a three-tone oddball task (Clark et al, 1996) and decreased P3 amplitudes to target tones within a standard two-tone oddball task (Gordeev, 2008) have been reported, reflecting disturbances in passive and active attentional mechanisms in PD, respectively (Muller-Gass and Campbell, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…N2 has been observed in an oddball task [Wang et al, 2003] and a recognition memory task [Kim et al, 2001]. With regard to the functional significance of N2, it is generally accepted that N2 constitutes an index of stimulus identification and categorization, and that it reflects the extraction of information required for the operation of later cognitive components, most notably P3 [Renault et al, 1982].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%