Equations for estimating GFR, quantifying urinary protein excretion, and assessing renal sodium handling are widely used in routine nephrology and general medical and surgical practice. If these equations are applied in circumstances inconsistent with the clinical situations for or extrapolated beyond the limits in which they were validated, clinicians can come to erroneous conclusions, which could be detrimental for patient care. A s physicians, we use equations to quantify physiologic and pathologic processes, such as measurement of renal function, estimation of proteinuria, and assessment of sodium handling, which are difficult to measure directly. Often, we do so without regard to the situation in which these formulas were initially derived and validated. By ignoring these important limitations, we may arrive at erroneous conclusions, risking compromise of the medical care we deliver to our patients. We use four case presentations to discuss common clinical settings in which the use and results of these equations may prove invalid.
Vignette 1-Use and Limitations of MDRD FormulaTN is a 46-yr-old, 95-kg