1994
DOI: 10.1086/173623
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nature of distant galaxies producing multiple C 4 absorption lines in the spectra of high-redshift quasars

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no previous report of detection of these objects in the literature. Aragon-Salamanca et al (1994) detected a faint object (K % 19:75) with an angular distance of 3 00 from the QSO line of sight, which could be object À1.81+2.04. Object À1.81+2.04 is evident in the HST F702W image.…”
Section: Q1329+412mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no previous report of detection of these objects in the literature. Aragon-Salamanca et al (1994) detected a faint object (K % 19:75) with an angular distance of 3 00 from the QSO line of sight, which could be object À1.81+2.04. Object À1.81+2.04 is evident in the HST F702W image.…”
Section: Q1329+412mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exact surface density of sources depends upon the passbands and colours used to define an ERO as well as the magnitude limit of the sample, reaching ∼0.1 sources per square arcmin redder than ( I − K )>5 at K =21 (Cowie et al, in preparation). EROs also appear to have higher surface densities, ×10–100, in the vicinity of high‐redshift active galactic nuclei (AGN) compared with the general field (Elston et al 1988; Soifer et al 1992; Aragon‐Salamanca et al 1994; Cowie et al 1994; Graham et al 1994; Hu & Ridgway 1994; Dey, Spinrad & Dickinson 1995; Graham & Dey 1996; Yamada et al 1997). This apparent clustering has led to speculation that at least some of the EROs are physically associated with luminous AGN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variety of colour criteria used to define EROs, e.g., (R−K)≥5, ≥ 5.3, ≥ 6.0 or (I−K)≥ 4, ≥ 5, together with different survey depths and apparently strong clustering (Daddi et al 2000a) have led to a wide dispersion in the claimed surface densities of EROs (e.g. Aragón‐Salamanca et al 1994; Cowie et al 1994; Hu & Ridgway 1994; Dey et al 1995; Moustakas et al 1997; Yamada et al 1997; Beckwith et al 1998; Eisenhardt et al 1998; Barger, Cowie & Trentham 1999; Thompson et al 1999; Daddi et al 2000a; McCracken et al 2000, hereafter M00). The larger and newer surveys suggest that to K≲19 the surface density of (R−K)≥6.0 galaxies is 0.07±0.01 arcmin −2 (Daddi et al 2000a), increasing to 0.33±0.05 arcmin −2 at the faintest limit probed to date K≲20 (Thompson et al 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%