2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nature of face representations in subcortical regions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If performance is better when the sequential stimuli are presented to a single eye than when stimuli are presented to different eyes, termed "monocular advantage," we can infer neural processing in the monocular portion of visual pathway mediated by subcortical regions. This monocular vs. dichoptic approach has already yielded interesting findings, revealing, for example, better matching of faces, but not of cars or words, under monocular vs. dichoptic conditions (76,77). Using the same approach, support for subcortical computation has also been uncovered in the domains of perceptual learning (77), spatial attention (78), and multisensory perception (79).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…If performance is better when the sequential stimuli are presented to a single eye than when stimuli are presented to different eyes, termed "monocular advantage," we can infer neural processing in the monocular portion of visual pathway mediated by subcortical regions. This monocular vs. dichoptic approach has already yielded interesting findings, revealing, for example, better matching of faces, but not of cars or words, under monocular vs. dichoptic conditions (76,77). Using the same approach, support for subcortical computation has also been uncovered in the domains of perceptual learning (77), spatial attention (78), and multisensory perception (79).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One possible mechanism may involve rerouting through the thalamus (Ajina et al, 2015), and subcortical structures may play an important role in reorganizing face recognition, given their role in bootstrapping cortex in the course of face perception in infancy (Johnson, 2005), continued engagement in face perception in adulthood (Gabay et al, 2014), and their phylogenetic role in face perception (Dyer et al, 2005). Another although not mutually exclusive possibility is that because face recognition is so complex and its developmental trajectory is protracted even into early adulthood (Germine et al., 2011), advantage can be taken of the continued growth of the neocortex itself with the addition of myelin, dendritic growth, non-neuronal cells, and a complex process of resculpting synapses present even into adolescence (Bei et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These subcortical routes might also be involved in the rapid processing of facial expression information (Morris et al, 2001; Tamietto and de Gelder, 2010), and the facial detection of infants with immature cortical visual systems might depend on the subcortical visual system (Johnson, 2005). Furthermore, human neuropsychological studies have reported substantial evidence that suggests that this subcortical pathway is involved in the discrimination of face gender and facial identity (Morris et al, 2001; Khalid et al, 2013; Gabay et al, 2014). Consistently, recent neurophysiological studies have reported that neurons in the monkey SC and pulvinar respond differentially to various photos of human and monkey faces, human facial expressions, and face-like patterns (Maior et al, 2010; Van Le et al, 2013; Nguyen et al, 2013, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%