2009
DOI: 10.1007/s00181-009-0331-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nature of regional unemployment in Italy

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an interesting finding, which is somehow consistent with the (although impure) hysteresis Italian regional economies have been recognized in terms of unemployment (e.g. Lanzafame, 2010Lanzafame, , 2012. As we said, this "multiplier effect" has already been detected in empirical studies at the firm-industry level (Dejardin, 2004), and interpreted by considering the induced effects of the death of an important business partner along the industry supply chain.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This is an interesting finding, which is somehow consistent with the (although impure) hysteresis Italian regional economies have been recognized in terms of unemployment (e.g. Lanzafame, 2010Lanzafame, , 2012. As we said, this "multiplier effect" has already been detected in empirical studies at the firm-industry level (Dejardin, 2004), and interpreted by considering the induced effects of the death of an important business partner along the industry supply chain.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Examples of empirical studies that have examined the time series behavior of unemployment using more recent methods that take into account the presence of nonlinearities, structural breaks or cross-sectional dependence (in the context of panel unit root tests) among countries or regions in unemployment rates include, among others, Gustavsson and Österholm (2006), Christopoulos and Leon-Ledesma (2007), Caporale and Gil-Alana (2008), Lanzafame (2010), Holl and Kunst (2011), while for Greece, the recent study of Bakas and Papapetrou (2014) offers an examination of the stochastic properties of Greek regional unemployment rates [3]. Gustavsson and Österholm (2006) employ the Kapetanios et al (2003) KSS procedure that tests the null hypothesis of a unit root against the alternative of a globally stationary nonlinear exponential smooth transition autoregressive process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sectional dependence is an 1 For a survey on the theories of hysteresis and a review on theoretical and empirical evidence on hysteresis see among others Roed (1997), Lanzafame (2010) and Bakas and Papapetrou (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%