1955
DOI: 10.4315/0022-2747-18.8.200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Nature, Significance and Control of Psychrophilic Bacteria in Dairy Products1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1957
1957
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was amply demonstrated, however, that incubation of plates a t 10" or higher does not give a true representation of the psychrotrophic bacterial content of milk, because thermoduric bacteria can form colonies at this temperature, and the psychrotrophic count cannot then be used as an index of postpasteurization contamination of freshly processed milk (e.g. Olsen, Willoughby, Atherton, Doan & Watrous, 1953Boyd, Smith & Trout, 1954;Olson, Parker & Mueller, 1955;Thome5 & Ljunggren, 1957; Thomas, Reinbold & Nelson, 1963). Baumann & Reinbold (1963~) cite 11 investigations demonstrating the importance of a true psychrotrophic count as an indication of postpasteurization contamination of milk.…”
Section: Development Of Standard Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was amply demonstrated, however, that incubation of plates a t 10" or higher does not give a true representation of the psychrotrophic bacterial content of milk, because thermoduric bacteria can form colonies at this temperature, and the psychrotrophic count cannot then be used as an index of postpasteurization contamination of freshly processed milk (e.g. Olsen, Willoughby, Atherton, Doan & Watrous, 1953Boyd, Smith & Trout, 1954;Olson, Parker & Mueller, 1955;Thome5 & Ljunggren, 1957; Thomas, Reinbold & Nelson, 1963). Baumann & Reinbold (1963~) cite 11 investigations demonstrating the importance of a true psychrotrophic count as an indication of postpasteurization contamination of milk.…”
Section: Development Of Standard Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After publication of the APHA (1953) recommended procedure of incubation a t 5" for 7 days, several investigators considered that this low temperature was too selective for dairy purposes, as refrigerated milk is frequently exposed to temperatures > 5", and that 45°F (7.3") was a fair average temperature for milk during distribution (Ford & Babel, 1959;Johns, 1960). Dahlberg, Adams & Held (1953) used incubation at 6-7" (44°F) for 10 days for enumeration of psychrotrophs during their survey of sanitary milk control in the U.S.A.; while Olson, Nielson, , Olson, Willoughby, Thomas & Morris (1953), Hempler (1955) and Olson, Parker & Mueller (1955) employed incubation at 7" for 10 days. During much earlier work, Robinton, Borman & Mickle (1941) and Jezeski & Macy (1946) had used incubation at 8" for 4 days and 7 days, respectively.…”
Section: (C) Incubation At 7"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The part played by pseudomonads in the spoilage of fish has been discussed by various workers (Shewan, Hobbs, and Hodgkiss, 1960;Adams, Farber, and Lerke, 1964), and the predominance of pseudomonads during the spoilage of eggs (Florian and Trussell, 1957), dairy products (Schultze and Olson, 1960;Olson, Parker, and Mueller, 1955;Witter, 1961), poultry (Ayres, Ogilvy, and Stewart, 1950), and beef (Ayres, 1960;Halleck, Ball, and Stier, 1958) is well documented. That water may be an important source of contaminating pseudomonads, especially in the dairy industry, has been emphasized by Olson et al (1955) and Witter (1961).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%