2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11284-012-1025-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The need for a canopy perspective to understand the importance of phenotypic plasticity for promoting species coexistence and light‐use complementarity in forest ecosystems

Abstract: Because of their overwhelming size over other organisms, trees define the structural and energetic properties of forest ecosystems. From grasslands to forests, leaf area index, which determines the amount of light energy intercepted for photosynthesis, increases with increasing canopy height across the various terrestrial ecosystems of the world. In vertically welldeveloped forests, niche differentiation along the vertical gradient of light availability may promote species coexistence. In addition, spatial and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
25
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There is limited evidence for temporal light partitioning in temperate grasslands (Anten and Hirose 1999), where phenological differences among species can enhance productivity, decomposition, and nitrogen retention (Mouillot et al 2011). Based on observations in cool-temperate forests in Japan, Ishii et al (2013) hypothesized that seasonal differentiation and variation in diurnal patterns of photosynthesis among species might provide an explanation for positive BEF relationships in forests. The potential for temporal niche complementarity, however, is probably limited by winter conditions in temperate ecosystems.…”
Section: Light Partitioning Through Niche Differences and Intraspecifmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is limited evidence for temporal light partitioning in temperate grasslands (Anten and Hirose 1999), where phenological differences among species can enhance productivity, decomposition, and nitrogen retention (Mouillot et al 2011). Based on observations in cool-temperate forests in Japan, Ishii et al (2013) hypothesized that seasonal differentiation and variation in diurnal patterns of photosynthesis among species might provide an explanation for positive BEF relationships in forests. The potential for temporal niche complementarity, however, is probably limited by winter conditions in temperate ecosystems.…”
Section: Light Partitioning Through Niche Differences and Intraspecifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such variability in crown allometry is strong enough to affect light capture in forests (Vieilledent et al 2010). Accordingly, individuallevel plasticity in photosynthesis-related traits might be large enough to explain species coexistence and positive diversity effects in forests (Ishii et al 2013). In our experiment, C. odorata grew larger crowns in mixtures FIG.…”
Section: Light Partitioning Through Niche Differences and Intraspecifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…canopy packing) increases community-level light capture and light use efficiency (Parker & Brown, 2000;Zhu, van der Werf, Anten, Vos, & Evers, 2015). The forests with different species of varying crown architectures and functional strategies can utilize different canopy positions in space, resulting in more efficient partitioning of space and light resources (Anten & Hirose, 1999;Ishii et al, 2013;Sapijanskas, Paquette, Potvin, Kunert, & Loreau, 2014) and the improvement of ecosystem productivity such as litterfall (Scherer-Lorenzen, Bonilla, & Potvin, 2010). Therefore, we hypothesized that tree species diversity would increase crown complementarity, thereby enhancing litterfall productivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resource partitioning can also occur due to differences in resource use efficiency (Nijs & Impens ), differences in annual growth rhythms leading to a spatial or temporal complementarity in resource use (Pretzsch ), plasticity in soil or light resource acquisition (Jumpponen et al . ; Ishii, Azuma & Nabeshima ) or stand vertical structure (Morin et al . ) leading to canopy stratification (Ishii & Asano ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%