The need to quantify authors’ relative intellectual contributions in a multi-author paper

Rahman, Mohammad Tariqur; Regenstein, Joe M.; Kassim, Noor Lide Abu; Haque, Nazmul

doi:10.1016/j.joi.2017.01.002

Cited by 36 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This increasing trend in multiauthor, multi-institutional, and multinational research collaborations has been found in other disciplines (Rahman et al, 2017; Yu et al, 2013). This increasing trend is beginning to raise some concerns as well.…”

Section: Collaborative Researchsupporting

confidence: 53%

“…The trends for each of the four journals highlight the point that single-authored research is becoming less common and that the trend of multipleauthored research has impacted the field of HRD and is expected to continue to grow. This increasing trend in multiauthor, multi-institutional, and multinational research collaborations has been found in other disciplines (Rahman et al, 2017;Yu et al, 2013). This increasing trend is beginning to raise some concerns as well.…”

Section: The Multi-ness Of Cross-disciplinary Researchmentioning

confidence: 79%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Collaborative Research: Techniques for Conducting Collaborative Research From the Science of Team Science (SciTS)

Turner

Baker

2020

Advances in Developing Human Resources

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Problem The field of human resource development (HRD) is a multidisciplinary field of research and practice requiring collaboration. Unfortunately, the literature on how to conduct collaborative research is incomplete within HRD and other disciplines. Any breakdown in the communication, exchange of ideas, agreed-upon methodologies, or shared credit for dissemination has the potential of preventing research from moving forward. Promotion and tenure policies also hamper collaborative efforts in that these policies often reward individual initiative as opposed to collaborative outcomes. These behavioral patterns provide constraints to the improvement and betterment of efforts to changing of the guard. The Solution This article highlights new and improved methods for working in collaborative environments. During an academic’s transition and professional development, these methods will help emerging scholars, new to collaborative research, when facing the team science revolution. The Stakeholders Scholars and scholar-practitioners engaged in collaborative research. Emerging scholars who are beginning their journey into collaborative research. Graduate students preparing for a career in academia.

show abstract

Section: Collaborative Researchsupporting

confidence: 53%

Section: The Multi-ness Of Cross-disciplinary Researchmentioning

confidence: 79%

Collaborative Research: Techniques for Conducting Collaborative Research From the Science of Team Science (SciTS)

Turner

Baker

2020

Advances in Developing Human Resources

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…They proposed a complex formula based on the similarity between scholars and their possessed skills to calculate the skillfulness level. Many works used authors' contribution information to measure their impact and analyzed collaboration patterns of authors (Persson, 2017;Paul-Hus et al, 2017;Rahman et al, 2017;Corrêa Jr. et al, 2017;Biswal, 2013). The contribution information can also be used in credit allocation and ranking authors (Sekercioglu, 2008;Dance, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Skill ranking of researchers via hypergraph

Kong

Liu

et al. 2019

PeerJ Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Researchers use various skills in their works, such as writing, data analysis and experiments design. These research skills have greatly influenced the quality of their research outputs, as well as their scientific impact. Although many indicators have been proposed to quantify the impact of researchers, studies of evaluating their scientific research skills are very rare. In this paper, we analyze the factors affecting researchers’ skill ranking and propose a new model based on hypergraph theory to evaluate the scientific research skills. To validate our skill ranking model, we perform experiments on the PLOS ONE dataset and compare the rank of researchers’ skills with their papers’ citation counts and h-index. Finally, we analyze the patterns about how researchers’ skill ranking increased over time. Our studies also show the change patterns of researchers between different skills.

show abstract

“…They proposed a complex formula based on the similarity between scholars and their possessed skills to calculate the skillfulness level. Many works used authors' contribution information to measure their impact and analyzed collaboration patterns of authors (Persson, 2017;Paul-Hus et al, 2017;Rahman et al, 2017;Jr et al, 2017;Biswal, 2013). The contribution information can also be used in credit allocation and ranking authors (Sekercioglu, 2008;Dance, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peer Review #3 of "Skill ranking of researchers via hypergraph (v0.2)"

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Researchers use various skills in their works, such as writing, data analysis and experiments design. These research skills have greatly influenced the quality of their research outputs, as well as their scientific impact. Although many indicators have been proposed to quantify the impact of researchers, studies of evaluating their scientific research skills are very rare. In this paper, we analyze the factors affecting researchers' skill ranking and propose a new model based on hypergraph theory to evaluate the scientific research skills. To validate our skill ranking model, we perform experiments on the PLoS One dataset and compare the rank of researchers' skills with their papers' citation counts and h-index. Finally, we analyze the patterns about how researchers' skill ranking increased over time. Our studies also show the change patterns of researchers between different skills.

show abstract

The need to quantify authors’ relative intellectual contributions in a multi-author paper

Cited by 36 publications

References 45 publications

Collaborative Research: Techniques for Conducting Collaborative Research From the Science of Team Science (SciTS)

Collaborative Research: Techniques for Conducting Collaborative Research From the Science of Team Science (SciTS)

Skill ranking of researchers via hypergraph

Peer Review #3 of "Skill ranking of researchers via hypergraph (v0.2)"

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About