The NEO Protocol for Large-Scale Distributed Database Systems: Modelling and Initial Verification

Choppy, Christine; Dedova, Anna; Évangelista, Sami; Hong, Silien; Klaï, Kaïs; Petrucci, Laure

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13675-7_10

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With "its-reach" functional properties could be checked as well as quantitative measures such as worst-case lifetime analysis. In the Neoppod project [13] the CTL component was used to verify response and consistency properties of a protocol for a distributed database. Inria's Atsyra project [26] computes attack defense trees from a DSL using a model-to-model transformation to GAL.…”

Section: Case Studies and Experimentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Symbolic Model-Checking Using ITS-Tools

Thierry-Mieg

2015

Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

International audienceWe present verification toolset ITS-tools, featuring a symbolic model-checking back-end engine based on hierarchical set decision diagrams (SDD) that supports reachability, CTL and LTL model-checking and a user-friendly eclipse based front-end. Using model transformations to a Guarded Action Language (GAL) as intermediate format, ITS-tools can analyze third party (Uppaal, Spin, Divine...) specifications

show abstract

Section: Case Studies and Experimentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Symbolic Model-Checking Using ITS-Tools

Thierry-Mieg

2015

Tools and Algorithms for the Construction and Analysis of Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The protocol, designed to handle a large distributed database over a cluster of machines, was described in [1,2]. Its main characteristics are shortly summarised in Section 3.1.…”

Section: Application Of the Guidelines To The Neo Protocolmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This paper does not get into the details of the numerous properties to check, a good part of which can be found in [1] and [2]. Many properties were provided as an informal statement by the code developers.…”

Section: Groundingmentioning

confidence: 99%

From Code to Coloured Petri Nets: Modelling Guidelines

Dedova

Petrucci

2013

Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency VIII

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Prior to that all master nodes agree on a primary master which will be the operating one, the other master nodes being secondary, waiting to replace the primary master if needed. This model specifies this election algorithm [9]. The scaling parameter is the number of master nodes.…”

Section: New Models In Mcc'2012mentioning

confidence: 99%

Report on the Model Checking Contest at Petri Nets 2011

Kordon

Linard

Buchs

et al. 2012

Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency VI

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. This article presents the results of the Model Checking Contest held within the SUMo 2011 workshop, a satellite event of Petri Nets 2011. This contest aimed at a fair and experimental evaluation of the performances of model checking techniques applied to Petri nets. The participating tools were compared on several examinations (state space generation, deadlock detection and evaluation of reachability formulae) run on a set of common models (Place/Transition and Symmetric Petri nets). The collected data gave some hints about the way techniques can scale up depending on both examinations and the characteristics of the models. This paper also presents the lessons learned from the organizer's point of view. It discusses the enhancements required for future editions of the Model Checking Contest event at the Petri Nets conference.

show abstract

The NEO Protocol for Large-Scale Distributed Database Systems: Modelling and Initial Verification

Cited by 8 publications

References 6 publications

Symbolic Model-Checking Using ITS-Tools

Symbolic Model-Checking Using ITS-Tools

From Code to Coloured Petri Nets: Modelling Guidelines

Report on the Model Checking Contest at Petri Nets 2011

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About