2009
DOI: 10.1016/s1053-8119(09)71638-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neural Basis of Introspection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our paradigm did not enable a valid comparison between trials in which metacognition was present and trials where it was absent. However, a recent study on interoception of event-times (Guggisberg et al, 2011) has done so. Interestingly, the patterns of neural activity that was related to introspection depended on the target of introspection, i.e., whether it concerned auditory perception, intentional or motor events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our paradigm did not enable a valid comparison between trials in which metacognition was present and trials where it was absent. However, a recent study on interoception of event-times (Guggisberg et al, 2011) has done so. Interestingly, the patterns of neural activity that was related to introspection depended on the target of introspection, i.e., whether it concerned auditory perception, intentional or motor events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, there is no neural evidence for the existence of an omnipresent observer or “decider” (see discussion in Montemayor, Allen, & Morsella, 2013). See additional neural evidence for the lack of such an omnipresent observer in Guggisberg, Dalal, and Nagarajan (2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%