2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2005.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neural, evolutionary, developmental, and bodily basis of metaphor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The embodiment-driven approach, however, has been criticized for its disregard of neural associations in the brain, as well as earlier occurrences of synaesthetic metaphors in the speech of young children compared with other types of metaphors, which might indicate that biological factors are at work (Marks et al 1987;Seitz 1997Seitz , 2005. Rakova (2003) has argued that linguistic synaesthesia has a biological motivation based on the evidence obtained in physiological research.…”
Section: Explanatory Models For Linguistic Synaesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The embodiment-driven approach, however, has been criticized for its disregard of neural associations in the brain, as well as earlier occurrences of synaesthetic metaphors in the speech of young children compared with other types of metaphors, which might indicate that biological factors are at work (Marks et al 1987;Seitz 1997Seitz , 2005. Rakova (2003) has argued that linguistic synaesthesia has a biological motivation based on the evidence obtained in physiological research.…”
Section: Explanatory Models For Linguistic Synaesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of such crossmodal associations shows that the brain is capable of abstracting supramodal similarities between stimuli from different modalities. Furthermore, the brain’s ability to extract such supramodal correspondences is the foundation of metaphorical thinking, i.e., the ability to perceive similarities between distant ideas (the phrase ‘distant ideas’ used here is on its own an example of a cross-modal association) (Marks, 1982 ; Ramachandran & Hubbard, 2001 ; Seitz, 2005 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst not specifically focused on mathematics, as was the case of Lakoff and Núñez (2000), Seitz (2005) proposes four different types of body-based metaphors, including (1) perceptual metaphors (spaghetti as a "bunch of worms"), (2) perceptual-affective mappings, (3) enactive metaphors (also called movement-movement metaphors, which involve metaphoric associations between moving things: the to-and-fro motion of a long string and a swing) and (4) cross-modal metaphor (in which associations are made from one domain-say, motion-to another-say, perception: two pencils akimbo are leaning over to tell each other a secret). Seitz would thus classify Lakoff and Núñez's "motion along a path" grounding metaphor as an enactive metaphor.…”
Section: Theoretical Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%