2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01370-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neurocognitive effects of low-dose haloperidol: a two-year comparison with risperidone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
4
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
86
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16]57,58 Also, in these studies, different antipsychotics have been tested against each other. 57,58 In contrast, EPO has been able as an add-on treatment, on top of a stable antipsychotic medication regime, to specifically target cognition in a group of chronic schizophrenic patients with clearly defined, persistent cognitive decline.…”
Section: H Ehrenreich Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[14][15][16]57,58 Also, in these studies, different antipsychotics have been tested against each other. 57,58 In contrast, EPO has been able as an add-on treatment, on top of a stable antipsychotic medication regime, to specifically target cognition in a group of chronic schizophrenic patients with clearly defined, persistent cognitive decline.…”
Section: H Ehrenreich Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,[13][14][15][16] Unfortunately, no drug up till now has been clearly shown to have lasting beneficial effects on cognition in schizophrenia. [14][15][16][17] The increasing evidence of neurodegenerative mechanisms acting in schizophrenia, particularly that derived from imaging data demonstrating progressive loss of cortical gray matter in this condition, [18][19][20] have led to a virtual renaissance of Kraepelin's dementia praecox considerations, 5 and have stimulated novel concepts of the disease, 7,[21][22][23][24][25] including therapeutic neuroprotection. 26 Based on previous observations by ourselves and others, erythropoietin (EPO) appears to be a promising candidate for neuroprotection in schizophrenia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SGAs may allow for improvements to take place (due to practice or due to effects beyond practice), while FGAs may preclude such improvements at traditional dosage levels (eg by impairing cognitive and motor learning in the basal ganglia) or may even impede performance (by slowing motor functioning or by requiring anticholinergic medication to control EPMS) (CWGoCTE, 1998;Kasper and Resinger, 2003;Carpenter and Gold, 2002). Interestingly, low-dose haloperidol (5 mg average daily dose) was found to result in similar cognitive improvements in schizophrenic patients as risperidone (6 mg average daily dose) over 2 years (Green et al, 2002), implying that even FGAs may have neurocognitive benefits at lower than traditional doses.…”
Section: Cognitive Improvement In Schizophrenic Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to typical drugs, neurocognitive improvements have been observed with risperidone treatment in the domain of verbal memory (Bilder et al, 2002;Kern et al, 1999) and attention (Harvey et al, 2000;Stip & Lussier, 1996). However, this is not always the case, as other studies have shown no difference between the effects of typical NLP and risperidone treatments on attention (Liu et al, 2000) and verbal learning and memory (Cuesta et al, 2001;Green et al, 2002;Purdon et al, 2000;Stip & Lussier, 1996). These divergent results may be due to differing methodological approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These divergent results may be due to differing methodological approaches. In the majority of studies, there is no healthy comparison group (Bilder et al, 2002;Cuesta et al, 2001;Green et al, 2002;Harvey et al, 2003;Kern et al, 1999;Liu et al, 2000;Purdon et al, 2000;Stip & Lussier, 1996); other studies are conducted at a specific point in time (or over a rather short period; Bilder et al, 2002;Harvey et al, 2000Harvey et al, , 2003Hong et al, 2002;Kern et al, 1999;Liu et al, 2000); and some considered the effects of a single treatment only (Stip & Lussier, 1996) or did not use a conventional NLP as a comparison group (Harvey et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%