2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2009.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The neuronal correlates of intranasal trigeminal function—an ALE meta-analysis of human functional brain imaging data

Abstract: Almost every odor we encounter in daily life has the capacity to produce a trigeminal sensation. Surprisingly, few functional imaging studies exploring human neuronal correlates of intranasal trigeminal function exist, and results are to some degree inconsistent. We utilized activation likelihood estimation (ALE), a quantitative voxel-based meta-analysis tool, to analyze functional imaging data (fMRI/PET) following intranasal trigeminal stimulation with carbon dioxide (CO2), a stimulus known to exclusively act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

11
88
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 113 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(113 reference statements)
11
88
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies in patients seem to confirm that [3,17]. Very recent fMRI studies in healthy subjects seem to further corroborate this functional interdependence by showing that intranasal trigeminal stimulation co-activates central olfactory areas such as the piriform cortex, while cutaneous trigeminal stimulation solely activates the traditional trigeminal areas [1,19]. The other way around, a very recent study in rats also suggests that gustatory function influences olfactory processing, thereby giving further evidence to the hypothesis of mutual chemosensory interaction [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Previous studies in patients seem to confirm that [3,17]. Very recent fMRI studies in healthy subjects seem to further corroborate this functional interdependence by showing that intranasal trigeminal stimulation co-activates central olfactory areas such as the piriform cortex, while cutaneous trigeminal stimulation solely activates the traditional trigeminal areas [1,19]. The other way around, a very recent study in rats also suggests that gustatory function influences olfactory processing, thereby giving further evidence to the hypothesis of mutual chemosensory interaction [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…This method provides a statistical description of the overlap between activation foci reported in neuroimaging studies. During the last few years, this method has been applied to identify the motor cortex involved in execution/observation of movements (Caspers et al, 2010), or to identify brain regions involved in audition (Petacchi et al, 2005), trigeminal sensation (Albrecht et al, 2010), olfaction, gustation, interoception, somatosensation, and pain (Kurth et al, 2010b). Recently, the ALE method has been applied to localize the vestibular cortex (Zu Eulenburg et al, 2012), but without identifying the cerebral networks responding differently and similarly to CVS, GVS and sounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intranasal route can be a hopeful substitution for MCHM injection, as drugs can be absorbed sufficiently and rapidly into blood for systemic administration (Albrecht et al, 2010;Zhou et al, 2010), then transported from the nasal cavity to the central nervous system (Illum, 2003). The intranasal route is safer due to the barricade effect of the nasal mucosa.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%