2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.alc.0000093601.33119.e3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Neurotoxicity Induced by Ethanol Withdrawal in Mature Organotypic Hippocampal Slices Might Involve Cross‐Talk Between Metabotropic Glutamate Type 5 Receptors and N‐Methyl‐d‐Aspartate Receptors

Abstract: From this model of long-term ethanol exposure and withdrawal, the functional interplay between mGluR5s and NMDARs might represent a novel target for the prevention of neurotoxicity associated with ethanol withdrawal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
62
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
4
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, in the CA1 region of ethanol pre-treated organotypic hippocampal slices, where neurotoxicity was observed after a 24-hr withdrawal, acamprosate, as well as SIB-1893, MK-801, and staurosporine were all neuroprotective. In this ethanol pre-treated slice culture preparations the polypeptide levels of mGluR5 receptors were found to be increased [77], similarly as the NR1 and NR2B subunits of NMDARs in other neuronal cultures after long-term ethanol exposure [150,176]. Considering these observations, acamprosate may act on the mGluR5 receptors reducing its positive feedback control over the NMDARs [217].…”
Section: Acamprosatementioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, in the CA1 region of ethanol pre-treated organotypic hippocampal slices, where neurotoxicity was observed after a 24-hr withdrawal, acamprosate, as well as SIB-1893, MK-801, and staurosporine were all neuroprotective. In this ethanol pre-treated slice culture preparations the polypeptide levels of mGluR5 receptors were found to be increased [77], similarly as the NR1 and NR2B subunits of NMDARs in other neuronal cultures after long-term ethanol exposure [150,176]. Considering these observations, acamprosate may act on the mGluR5 receptors reducing its positive feedback control over the NMDARs [217].…”
Section: Acamprosatementioning
confidence: 61%
“…Besides several other factors (e.g. functional deficits of GABA receptors and increased VGCC function [77,212]), the NMDARs are major contributors to the increased glutamate release during alcohol withdrawal since in the brain of ethanol-dependent rats, the extracellular concentration of glutamate shows a transient, NMDAR mediated increase after cessation of ethanol intake and these changes are time-locked to the behavioural signs of ethanol withdrawal [44,53,183]. This enhanced glutamate release may contribute to the further shift towards the excitatory dominance in the CNS after ethanol withdrawal [184].…”
Section: Consequences Of Increased Nmdar Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the mechanistic point of view, acamprosate is reported to act as a functional NMDA receptor antagonistFpartially through an interplay with mGluR5 receptors (Harris et al, 2002(Harris et al, , 2003Fmodulating activity of dopaminergic neurons within the mesolimbic reward system (Olive et al, 2002;Cano-Cebrian et al, 2003). Since augmented dopaminergic activity is thought to underlie drug-seeking responses (Spanagel and Weiss, 1999;Liu and Weiss, 2002), in reinstatement experiments acamprosate might attenuate ethanol-paired cue effects through an inhibition of glutamatergic activity and a subsequent decrease of dopaminergic function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acamprosate can modulate hyper-glutamatergic activity by a variety of actions. Specifically, it regulates NMDA receptor subunit composition Rammes et al, 2001), binds to a specific spermidine-sensitive site modulating the NMDA receptor in a complex way (AlQatari et al, 1998;Naassila et al, 1998), blocks voltagedependent Ca 2 þ -channels (Littleton, 1995;Allgaier et al, 2000), or as recently hypothesized, interacts with group I metabotropic glutamate receptors subtype 5 (mGluR5) (Harris et al, 2002(Harris et al, , 2003.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, activation of different receptor types may either attenuate or exacerbate intracellular events caused by the simultaneous activation of other types of GluRs on the same cell. Such cross-talk has been demonstrated for functional interactions in neuronal cells between different types of iGluRs (Carpenter 2002) and also in both directions between mGluRs and NMDA-activated iGluRs (Boldyrev 2000;Krieger et al 2000;Hermans and Challiss 2001;Harris et al 2003). There is strong evidence that the interaction between activated iGluRs and mGluRs is involved in neuroplasticity in vivo (Jeffery and Hayman 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%