“…Moreover, what it commits to is open to evolution and change in a far more expansive way than is the expectation of action under a contract." In fact, I agree with Hardin's (1988) claim that "the very analogy to contract is wrong insofar as contracts require sanctions to back them"-or Gordon's (1976) complaint that:…”
Section: Constitution As Coordination Mechanism-and Not a Contractmentioning
Constitutional restraints on government are tricky and evanescent; government failure (a lapse into anarchy or leviathan) has historically been the norm, and constitutional success an infrequent exception. To shed light on constitutional maintenance, this article examines the concept of constitutional review by studying three competing systems: the American/Marshall system of judicial review; the Commonwealth/Westminster model of parliamentary sovereignty; and the Kelsen compromise between the two. Each system's strengths and weaknesses are assessed, as constitutional framers navigate the treacherous waters between the Scylla of parliamentary tyranny and Charybdis of gouvernement des juges. In the end, neither extreme is perfect, but lessons are drawn from each of the three models.Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? 1
“…Moreover, what it commits to is open to evolution and change in a far more expansive way than is the expectation of action under a contract." In fact, I agree with Hardin's (1988) claim that "the very analogy to contract is wrong insofar as contracts require sanctions to back them"-or Gordon's (1976) complaint that:…”
Section: Constitution As Coordination Mechanism-and Not a Contractmentioning
Constitutional restraints on government are tricky and evanescent; government failure (a lapse into anarchy or leviathan) has historically been the norm, and constitutional success an infrequent exception. To shed light on constitutional maintenance, this article examines the concept of constitutional review by studying three competing systems: the American/Marshall system of judicial review; the Commonwealth/Westminster model of parliamentary sovereignty; and the Kelsen compromise between the two. Each system's strengths and weaknesses are assessed, as constitutional framers navigate the treacherous waters between the Scylla of parliamentary tyranny and Charybdis of gouvernement des juges. In the end, neither extreme is perfect, but lessons are drawn from each of the three models.Sed quis custodiet ipsos custodes? 1
“…Instead, it emphasizes formal, contractual mechanisms (see, e.g., Buchanan 1990Buchanan , 1975Brennan and Buchanan 1985; for commentary and critique, see also Hardin 1988;Gordon 1976). 1 Even a culturally aware economist such as Jones (2006, 110) writes that "liberty and property are preserved by the law, and not by values."…”
Section: Constitutional Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…I suspect there exits a "measurability bias" of sorts in economics (which is, after all, the mother discipline of constitutional political economy): culture does not fit into tidy models or econometric regressions, so it is simpler to assume it away (seeJones 2006; see alsoEvans 2007, commenting on Boulding 1974Chamlee-Wright 1997;Tilly 2003; and Lavoie and Chamlee-Wright 2000, 42).2 Voigt (1996) explains that "whereas Buchanan is clearly leading the contract notion of the constitution,Hayek [e.g., 1979Hayek [e.g., [1973Hayek [e.g., , 1976Hayek [e.g., , 1979 and 1988) is almost as clearly leading the notion of the constitution as the result of cultural evolution"; see alsoHardin (1988) andGordon (1976).…”
“…This structure led the League to be called by Germany a victors' club (Northedge 1986, Scott 1973). Buchanan, Rawls, and Nozick all argue that it is the process by which the social contract is formed which determines its fairness (Gordon 1976). The legitimacy and fairness of the social contract stem from the voluntary nature of the agreement.…”
Section: H a Brief History Of The League Of Nationsmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.