2019
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00038-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The new haemodynamic definition of pulmonary hypertension: evidence prevails, finally!

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2018 6th world PH symposium discussed the revised definition of hemodynamics and lowered the PAP threshold for PH diagnosis from > 25mm Hg to > 20 mm Hg. [19][20][21] This change is expected to enhance the early detection of PHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2018 6th world PH symposium discussed the revised definition of hemodynamics and lowered the PAP threshold for PH diagnosis from > 25mm Hg to > 20 mm Hg. [19][20][21] This change is expected to enhance the early detection of PHD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In systemic sclerosis, incorporating TTE with pulmonary function testing and biomarkers may have a higher predictive value in asymptomatic patients than echocardiography alone 27,28 . This may be important because even those patients with relatively mild PH require more frequent hospitalization and suffer shortened survival 29,30 . Future studies of PH in MPN should clearly define prospective criteria for screening, risk stratification, and criteria for RHC confirmation of PH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pros and cons of the proposed revision to the definition of PH have been debated in the literature 7 , 8 . In our opinion, the proposed threshold of an mPAP of >20 mmHg is the correct threshold to use for defining PH, and the greater emphasis given to elevated PVR for detecting pulmonary vascular disease is a necessary paradigm shift.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our opinion, the proposed threshold of an mPAP of >20 mmHg is the correct threshold to use for defining PH, and the greater emphasis given to elevated PVR for detecting pulmonary vascular disease is a necessary paradigm shift. The clinical justification for the suggested change has been described in detail elsewhere, 1 , 7 yet as the proposal is relatively recent and has not yet been adopted in clinical practice, there are limited data on how it will affect clinical management. Therefore, in this article, we will discuss the potential effect of this revised definition on patient management, based on our clinical experience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%