The New Normal: Twelve Months of Resiliency and Recovery in Christchurch

Abstract

<jats:title>ABSTRACT</jats:title><jats:p>The series of earthquakes and aftershocks that have hit Christchurch, New Zealand, for more than one year has been severe and sustained, resulting in major damage to homes, buildings, essential services, and resources in water, sewerage, food, access to health care, energy for heating and cooling, and unprecedented challenges to resiliency. Large swathes of destroyed buildings, land damage, and liquefaction have made rebuilding impossible for many. Populations have moved or report that they either wish to or plan to do so. For those who remain, a ”new normal” mindset has taken hold and serves as an objective measure for the process that defines daily life and future decisions. The new normal serves as an uncomfortable but realistic guideline by which further resiliency can be measured. A number of factors have led to the development of the new normal state for the Christchurch earthquake survivors.</jats:p><jats:p>(<jats:italic>Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness</jats:italic>. 2012;6:33-43)</jats:p>

Creative ventures and the personalities that activate them in a post‐disaster setting

“…This was “the new normal” (McColl & Burkle, , p. 33). In turn, the increase in creative, unusual ventures and public artworks seemed to fuel the appetite and appreciation for such novelty.…”

Building community resilience: learning from the Canterbury earthquakes

“…At the time of writing, the earthquakes and associated aftershocks have contributed to chronic stress and uncertainty in the community for over three years. The Canterbury earthquakes are unique internationally in their intensity and in the repeated damage they have caused in large urban and suburban communities, including the central business district (McColl & Burkle 2012). The February earthquake's peak ground accelerations, which describe an earthquake's intensity, were among the highest ever recorded worldwide (National Geophysical Data Center 2012).…”

Developing a comprehensive model of hazard preparedness: Lessons from the Christchurch earthquake

“…Recognition of these circumstances has prompted the development of approaches to managing seismic risk that range from mitigation (e.g., land use planning, building design) to encouraging people to prepare. Preparedness strategies attempt to develop the knowledge, beliefs, attitudes and actions that increase people's ability to cope with, adapt to and recover from earthquake hazard consequences that can occur suddenly and can last for extensive periods of time (especially when accompanied by multiple, serious aftershocks) [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”

“…If confirmation of preparedness as a multi-faceted phenomenon is forthcoming, a more searching analysis of predictors will be required [5,8,10,36,37]. The rational for the latter is introduced later.…”