También se analizan cuatro casos concretos en los que se pueden observar diferencias regionales en el propio sistema y cuidadas excepciones.
Abstract:The purpose of this work is to analyze philanthrocapitalism (or venture philanthropy) from the perspective of social action and how it has been gone displaying over the past few years, in which has finally become an additional tool of the development cooperation, the fight against poverty or disease. In a global economic perspective, philanthropic foundations work in areas that formerly belonged to the State, or, in cases of less developed countries, never became public.The decrease of social policies and the pursuit of a global development strategy have promoted the growth of these organizations. Public-Private Partnerships are, in most cases, the innovative way they choose for their funding, using the distribution of risks and benefits. We are witness of a form of philanthropy in which philanthropists are motivated not only a desire altruistic, but is seeking projects that are beneficial.In this context, philanthropy becomes not only a new tool for development but also an analytical prism. Philanthropists become ethical leaders and hegemony becomes a basic concept to understand their movements. This thesis analyzes the philanthrocapitalist system from various perspectives. On the one hand, the sociohistorical conditions of philanthropy, the motivations and own philanthropic foundations are analyzed from the point of view of their interests, their objectives, their legitimacy and hegemony. Furthermore, we will see its funding, as well as its limitations.As a practical matter, we look at the discourses of philanthropic foundations and supranational organizations to see how they line up and how they use ambiguous concepts to generate new ideas and meanings. Four specific cases where regional differences can be observed in the system itself and maintained exceptions are analyzed.