2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nitrification inhibitor DMPP (3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate) reduces N2 emissions from intensively managed pastures in subtropical Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
46
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main source of N 2 O in both soils was denitrification, accounting for more than 90% of N 2 O produced ( Fig. 2), which is in line with previous results from both field 11 and laboratory studies 10,12 . The ability of soils to act as an N 2 O sink, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The main source of N 2 O in both soils was denitrification, accounting for more than 90% of N 2 O produced ( Fig. 2), which is in line with previous results from both field 11 and laboratory studies 10,12 . The ability of soils to act as an N 2 O sink, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The high microbial activity in the loam also infers a larger number of microsites with nitrifying activity compared to the sandy CL, suggesting the spatial separation of DMPP from nitrifiers may be responsible for the short-term inefficacy of DMPP to reduce autotrophic nitrification in the loam. This theory is further supported by a study where DMPP did not affect the initial pulse of N 2 O after fertilization and irrigation from the loam, but reduced denitrification losses after that initial period 11 . This shows a delayed effect of DMPP in this soil, demanding further research on how diffusion in the soil matrix, sorption and distribution affects DMPPs efficacy to reduce autotrophic nitrification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Past studies across a range of land uses and N sources demonstrate the interactive effects of WFPS on D p /D o and associated N 2 O emissions: under inorganic-N fertilizer with WFPS above 65 to 80% rapid and nonlinear increases in N 2 O emissions occurred (McTaggart et al, 2002) which were attributed to denitrification-derived N 2 O production; Schaufler et al (2010) found that N 2 O emissions in grasslands (fertilized and unfertilized) peaked around a WFPS of 80% with the moisture optima soil type dependent (Schaufler et al, 2010): Petersen et al (2008) reported nonlinear variations in N 2 O fluxes in response to varying WFPS irrespective of the soil type under varying tillage treatments. An in situ study by Friedl et al (2017) examined the potential for nitrification inhibitors to reduce N 2 losses from intensively managed subtropical pastures, found that N 2 losses were triggered when D p /D o values indicated the development of anaerobic conditions ( < 0.02, Stepniewski, 1980). Owens et al (2017) examined N 2 O fluxes from ruminant urine-affected soil, with respect to WFPS and D p /D o , and reported that D p /D o explained the variability in N 2 O fluxes better than WFPS, 73 and 65% respectively, and that, consistent with earlier laboratory studies (Balaine et al, 2013;Balaine et al, 2016), N 2 O emissions become elevated as D p /D o declined toward a value of 0.006.…”
Section: N 2 O Emissionsmentioning
confidence: 99%