1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(97)80986-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The nomadic engram: overtraining eliminates the impairment of discriminative avoidance behavior produced by limbic thalamic lesions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
16
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Rose and colleagues (Clements and Rose, 1996;Rose and Stewart, 1999) have used a chick model of passive avoidance conditioning to show that during learning there are time-dependent shifts in neural activity and neurochemistry that occur across different brain regions. Similarly, time-limited shifts in the role of different thalamic nuclei occur during discriminative avoidance conditioning in rabbits (Hart et al, 1997). Here, we show that reorganization of motor maps and synaptogenesis within the motor cortex during motor skill training does not occur during the initial fast phase of learning but rather during the second, slower phase of learning when the rate of gain of performance is much lower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…For example, Rose and colleagues (Clements and Rose, 1996;Rose and Stewart, 1999) have used a chick model of passive avoidance conditioning to show that during learning there are time-dependent shifts in neural activity and neurochemistry that occur across different brain regions. Similarly, time-limited shifts in the role of different thalamic nuclei occur during discriminative avoidance conditioning in rabbits (Hart et al, 1997). Here, we show that reorganization of motor maps and synaptogenesis within the motor cortex during motor skill training does not occur during the initial fast phase of learning but rather during the second, slower phase of learning when the rate of gain of performance is much lower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…The formation of a long-term memory in the RSC in this task appears to depend on interactions between the HPC and the RSC occurring around 12 h after learning, when waves of IEG activation and protein synthesis occur in both regions that are necessary for the development of long-term (but not short-term) memory (Katche et al, 2010, 2013a). A number of other studies have also shown that spatial and contextual memories continue to rely on the RSC after they have become hippocampal independent, leading some authors to suggest that critical elements of these memories are permanently stored in the RSC (Maviel et al, 2004; Gusev and Gubin, 2010; Corcoran et al, 2011; but see Hart et al, 1997). The development of RSC neural responses also suggests a role for the RSC in the long-term memory consolidation.…”
Section: Learning and Consolidationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, incorporating random practice (contextual interference)4042 and overlearning (ie, continued practice of a task after having reached some success criterion)4345 can lead to improved retention effects. For example, a single low acquisition session consisting of a brief exposure to a block of slips (5 slips only) without any additional ancillary sessions was insufficient to yield retention in stability for prevention of backward balance loss 12 months later 46.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%