1930
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0090257
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Non-Linear Relationship of Egg Weight and Annual Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

1930
1930
1958
1958

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest a correlation between the body weight at eight weeks and egg weight. This correlation would be expected because of the association of the body weight at eight weeks with body weight at maturity and the association of mature body weight and egg weight found by Atwood and Clark (1930), Hall and Marble (1930), Marble (1930), and others.…”
Section: Data and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These results suggest a correlation between the body weight at eight weeks and egg weight. This correlation would be expected because of the association of the body weight at eight weeks with body weight at maturity and the association of mature body weight and egg weight found by Atwood and Clark (1930), Hall and Marble (1930), Marble (1930), and others.…”
Section: Data and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The correlation of rate from December 1 to March 1 with March egg weight was +.075. Other investigators (Marble, 1930;Blyth, 1952), have found the relationship to be nonlinear, birds with very high and very low rates of production laying smaller eggs. Farnsworth (1956) found the average phenotypic correlation of total egg production and March egg weight in eight generations of Leghorns to be essentially zero.…”
Section: Phenotypic and Genetic Correlationsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Hadley and Caldwell (1920), Atwood (1923), Hall (1923), , Lohman (1924), Upp and Thompson (1927), Atwood and Clark (1930) and Marble (1930) have reported significant relationships between mean annual or maximum body weight and mean annual egg weight. Likewise, Atwood (1923), , Lohman (1924), Parkhurst (1926), Upp and Thompson (1927) and Atwood and Clark (1930) studied the relationship between mean annual egg weight and annual egg production but failed to find significant relationships.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Likewise, Atwood (1923), , Lohman (1924), Parkhurst (1926), Upp and Thompson (1927) and Atwood and Clark (1930) studied the relationship between mean annual egg weight and annual egg production but failed to find significant relationships. Marble (1930) pointed out that this relationship was significantly non-linear in nature and that these two factors were correlated to a small degree when the relationship was measured by means of the correlation ratio. The importance of days to maturity as an influencing factor has been found to be of medium to no value by such investigators as Atwood (1923, Lippincott, Parker andSehaumberg (1925) andParkhurst (1926).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%