The Normative Distinctiveness of the European Union in International Development: Stepping Out of the Shadow of the World Bank?

Abstract

This paper seeks to contribute to the debate on the European Union (EU)'s distinctiveness as an international actor. In particular, it examines whether there is anything distinctive about the international development norms promoted by the EU. Previous studies have indicated that in the field of development policy the EU is predominantly a 'norm taker', meaning that it has to a large extent translated development aid norms originating from other donors, including the World Bank, into its own development policies. However, in recent years the EU has arguably become a more mature, ambitious and professionalized development actor, which explicitly aims to take the lead on the international development front. Therefore, this paper assesses whether the EU is still taking on development aid norms originating from the World Bank, generally considered a leader in international development thinking, influencing many other donors, including the EU. The paper does so by focusing on the development areas of governance, aid effectiveness and the social dimension of development. Importantly, the paper situates 'norms' at the specific level of 'policy ideas' (as opposed to 'programmatic' and 'philosophical' ideas), since normative differences between the EU and the World Bank -if any -might be translated differently by the two actors. Accordingly, the paper hypothesizes that both substantially and procedurally the EU has been stepping out of the shadow of the World Bank.Based on the findings presented in the paper, it appears that in the three areas studied the EU has effectively made a shift away from being a pure norm-taker from the World Bank, and towards becoming a more distinctive development actor, at least to some extent. Indeed, the paper finds that since the 2000s the EU and the World Bank have increasingly developed a different interpretation of the concepts of governance and aid effectiveness and the social dimension of development, both in terms of substance and procedure.2

Too Effective for Europe? The UK, Norm Advocacy and the Case of EU International Cooperation

“…International development cooperation is a form of EU external action that is characterized by a coordination gap between the largely independent policies of the EU institutions and member states (Carbone, , ; Orbie, ; Orbie et al, ). As a parallel competence, the European Commission has independent financial and human resources to conduct its own international cooperation in addition to the member states.…”

“…This article traces how policy professionals have participated in contesting common EU norms through competition over the EU's effectiveness in development cooperation. The analysis also contributes to our understanding of what drives norm advocacy regarding the EU's role in international cooperation (Lightfoot and Kim, 2017;Orbie, 2012;Orbie et al, 2017).…”

“…At the same time, Brexit potentially affects the challenge of strengthening multilateralism as well as the EU's ability to respond to this challenge. There have been multiple EU policy norms in the context of international development cooperation, ranging from promoting democracy to good governance and increasing the effectiveness of aid and development (Orbie, ; Orbie et al, ). This article concentrates on key norms, namely those regarding the effectiveness of aid and development, which have been dominant in EU development policies, especially after 2000.…”

Italian cooperation with Mozambique: explaining the emergence and consolidation of a normative power

“…Liberal institutionalist and constructivist studies, on the contrary, stress the influence of donor institutions such as political parties and civil society organizations, and their interests and ideologies, on the development strategies of Western donors (Lancaster, 2008;Van der Veen, 2011;Lundsgaarde, 2012;Greene and Licht, 2017). Building upon these perspectives, studies of European development cooperation represent the EU as a normative power, that is, an actor that engages in the promotion of norms through development cooperation (Holden, 2016;Orbie et al, 2017). Further elaborating on this tradition, several scholars have proposed an ideational account of Italian cooperation with Mozambique.…”

The European Union as a Collective Actor: Aid and Trade in African Public Opinion

“…In its external interactions, the EU acts in accordance with its self-image as a normative power (Manners, 2002;Lucarelli and Manners, 2006;Elgstr€ om and Chaban, 2015;Orbie et al, 2016). In contrast to the classical global powers, the EU views its role as promoting universalist human rights norms and its own modes of multilevel governance.…”