2013
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate

Abstract: Abstract. The core version of the Norwegian Climate Center's Earth System Model, named NorESM1-M, is presented. The NorESM family of models are based on the Community Climate System Model version 4 (CCSM4) of the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, but differs from the latter by, in particular, an isopycnic coordinate ocean model and advanced chemistry-aerosol-cloud-radiation interaction schemes. NorESM1-M has a horizontal resolution of approximately 2 • for the atmosphere and land components and … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
586
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 836 publications
(602 citation statements)
references
References 162 publications
(223 reference statements)
13
586
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The rank that the observational estimates would have as a member of each ensemble of simulations [Hamill, 2001;Annan and Hargreaves, 2010] shows a slight tendency for observational estimates to fall with a higher frequency in the vicinity of the lower simulations for the CMIP5 (Figure 1c). This behavior is not present in the MPI-ESM large ensemble (Figure 1d) and is most likely caused by estimates in the period of 1999-2014.…”
Section: Internal Variability In Tropical Tropospheric Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rank that the observational estimates would have as a member of each ensemble of simulations [Hamill, 2001;Annan and Hargreaves, 2010] shows a slight tendency for observational estimates to fall with a higher frequency in the vicinity of the lower simulations for the CMIP5 (Figure 1c). This behavior is not present in the MPI-ESM large ensemble (Figure 1d) and is most likely caused by estimates in the period of 1999-2014.…”
Section: Internal Variability In Tropical Tropospheric Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For simulations, we use historical and RCP4.5 runs from 44 different GCMs from the CMIP5 archive [Taylor et al, 2012;Bi et al, 2013;Xin et al, 2013;Ji et al, 2014;von Salzen et al, 2013;Meehl et al, 2012;Hurrell et al, 2012;Scoccimarro et al, 2011;Voldoire et al, 2013;Rotstayn et al, 2010;Hazeleger et al, 2010;Li et al, 2013;Delworth et al, 2006;Donner et al, 2011;Schmidt et al, 2014;Smith et al, 2010;Collins et al, 2011;Jones et al, 2011;Volodin et al, 2010;Dufresne et al, 2013;Hourdin et al, 2013;Sakamoto et al, 2012;Watanabe et al, 2010Watanabe et al, , 2011Giorgetta et al, 2013;Yukimoto et al, 2012;Bentsen et al, 2013], and from the 100 realization single-model large ensemble of the MPI-ESM [Giorgetta et al, 2013]. The large ensemble uses the model version MPI-ESM1.1 in low resolution (LR) configuration, with resolution T63 and 47 vertical levels in the atmosphere and 1.5 ∘ resolution and 40 vertical levels in the ocean.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimates were grouped into four submodels: GFDL-ESM2M [57], IPSL-CM5A-LR [58], MIROC-ESM-CHEM [59], and NorESM1-M [60], at two extremes of the concentrations of GHGs, representative concentration pathway (RCP) 2.6 and RCP 8.5, which cover the daily average temperature and precipitation data at a resolution of 0.5 • for the period 1950-2099 (the present research considered only the 2015-2099 subset). Given the greater uncertainty in estimating values from a single set, the average of the four climate models was used.…”
Section: Meteorological Drought Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulations were conducted using the coupled atmospheric-ocean-aerosol model NorESM1-M [Bentsen et al, 2013;Iversen et al, 2013]. NorESM1-M is an Earth System Model that for the atmospheric part of the model uses a modified version of the Community Atmospheric Model version 4 [CAM4; Neale et al, 2013]-CAM4-Oslo [Kirkevåg et al, 2013].…”
Section: Climate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%