1979
DOI: 10.1016/0020-0190(79)90023-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The np-completeness of the hamiltonian cycle problem in planar diagraphs with degree bound two

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, if deleting a set of edges from a cubic graph G results in an Eulerian graph G , then each vertex in G must have degree 2, so G must be a Hamiltonian cycle of G. Since the HAMILTONIAN CYCLE problem restricted to cubic planar graphs is NP-hard [16] the result follows. The directed version can be treated in a similar way using NP-hardness from [30].…”
Section: Directed Eulerian Edge Deletionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, if deleting a set of edges from a cubic graph G results in an Eulerian graph G , then each vertex in G must have degree 2, so G must be a Hamiltonian cycle of G. Since the HAMILTONIAN CYCLE problem restricted to cubic planar graphs is NP-hard [16] the result follows. The directed version can be treated in a similar way using NP-hardness from [30].…”
Section: Directed Eulerian Edge Deletionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2DHCP consists of asserting whether or not D H contains a Hamiltonian circuit, that is, a closed walk traversing all the vertices of V H exactly once. The 2DHCP is known to be NP-complete [3]. We remark that the proof given by Plesnik [3] was devised for planar digraphs with indegrees and outdegrees at most two, yet by considering some additional arcs, we can easily extend this result to planar digraphs (with possible multiple arcs) with indegrees and outdegrees two.…”
Section: Np-completeness Of the Ecwppcpmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[15]. We modify Plesník's construction to create a gap-preserving reduction, then apply our reduction on Max-3SAT(29).…”
Section: Inapproximability Of Max Vertex-disjoint Path Cover(2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This construction is largely the same as that from Ref. [15], but in- is set to True. Edge e 1 corresponds to a True literal (x i ), so it must not be traversed when we visit the clause side of the graph; edge e 2 corresponds to a False literal (x i ) and therefore must be traversed.…”
Section: Max-3sat(29) =⇒ Max Vertex-disjoint Path Cover(2)mentioning
confidence: 99%