Recent research has implicated the nucleus accumbens (NAc) in consolidating recently acquired goal-directed appetitive memories, including spatial learning and other instrumental processes. However, an important but unresolved issue is whether this forebrain structure also contributes to the consolidation of fundamental forms of appetitive learning acquired by Pavlovian associative processes. In addition, although dopaminergic and glutamatergic influences in the NAc have been implicated in instrumental learning, it is unclear whether similar mechanisms operate during Pavlovian conditioning. To evaluate these issues, the effects of posttraining intra-NAc infusions of D1, D2, and NMDA receptor antagonists, as well as D-amphetamine, were determined on Pavlovian autoshaping in rats, which assesses learning by discriminated approach behavior to a visual conditioned stimulus predictive of food reward. Intracerebral infusions were given either immediately after each conditioning session to disrupt early memory consolidation or after a delay of 24 h. Findings indicate that immediate, but not delayed, infusions of both D1 (SCH 23390) and NMDA (AP-5) receptor antagonists significantly impair learning on this task. By contrast, amphetamine and the D2 receptor antagonist sulpiride were without significant effect. These findings provide the most direct demonstration to date that D1 and NMDA receptors in the NAc contribute to, and are necessary for, the early consolidation of appetitive Pavlovian learning.consolidation ͉ dopamine ͉ learning ͉ autoshaping ͉ glutamate T he nucleus accumbens (NAc) is increasingly regarded as a key forebrain structure underlying appetitive learning and memory (1, 2), and there is widespread interest in understanding the involvement of NAc dopamine (DA) and glutamate in this process (3-7). Blockade of D1 and NMDA receptors in the NAc impairs the acquisition, but not the performance, of appetitive instrumental conditioning (4,8). Likewise, antagonism of NAc NMDA and DA receptors (9), as well as selective NAc DA depletion (10, 11), impairs Pavlovian conditioned behavior. However, because all of these studies manipulated NAc DA and glutamate function prior to conditioning, it is possible that several processes relevant to learning and memory were affected, including acquisition, consolidation, and retrieval. Posttraining manipulations define more precisely the nature of the learning deficit, in addition to avoiding possible confounding effects of nonspecific performance factors on learning (12). Indeed, a number of studies report significant effects on radial maze and water maze learning after posttraining systemic (13,14), intracaudate (15), and intra-NAc (3) administration of DA receptor agents. Furthermore, recent research indicates that early consolidation of instrumental learning requires new protein synthesis in the NAc (16).However, there have been remarkably few studies investigating the involvement of DA and glutamate in the consolidation of appetitive Pavlovian learning. Although posttraini...