2019
DOI: 10.1080/00918369.2019.1616428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The “Okay” Gay Guys: Developing Hegemonic Sexuality as a Tool to Understand Men’s Workplace Identities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study found that heteronormativity is prevalent in mining workplaces and informs the everyday lives of gay men at work. Similar to previous research on heteronormative silence in male-dominated workplaces (Collins & Callahan, 2012;Reingardė, 2010;Speice, 2020), this study found that the dominant heteronormative male occupational culture of the mining industry silences and renders black gay mineworkers invisible. The participants in this study expressed fear of disclosing their gay identities because of the prevalent stigmatisation of gay identities and religious beliefs and cultural traditions used to condemn same-sex desires.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study found that heteronormativity is prevalent in mining workplaces and informs the everyday lives of gay men at work. Similar to previous research on heteronormative silence in male-dominated workplaces (Collins & Callahan, 2012;Reingardė, 2010;Speice, 2020), this study found that the dominant heteronormative male occupational culture of the mining industry silences and renders black gay mineworkers invisible. The participants in this study expressed fear of disclosing their gay identities because of the prevalent stigmatisation of gay identities and religious beliefs and cultural traditions used to condemn same-sex desires.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Her argument is supported by various international and South African studies, which have found that the masculine occupational culture of male-dominated workplaces is not only exclusive to women but also excludes gay men because they do not conform to heteronormative ways of being a man (Carey et al, 2022;Collins, 2015). Heteronormativity within male-dominated workplaces affords heterosexual men more social power because they embody an ideal masculinity established as a standard when its value is assessed compared to femininity and gay men's masculinities (Speice, 2020).…”
Section: Gender and Sexuality In The South African Mining Industry: A...mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Since dressing functions as a crucial component of gender construction and performance (Simmel, 1957; Butler, 1990), LGBTQ + individuals are required to reconsider their dressings before visiting their workplace. Socially appropriate dressing is often synonymous with professional dressing (Speice, 2020). Heterosexual individuals do not encounter this additional pressure of their dressing style filtered for gender appropriateness.…”
Section: Outcomes Of Discriminatory Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterosexual individuals do not encounter this additional pressure of their dressing style filtered for gender appropriateness. Also, dressing like heterosexual individuals is often used as a gender management strategy to hide one's LGBTQ þ identity and avoid the discrimination evident in the hiring and promotion process (Speice, 2020).…”
Section: Outcomes Of Discriminatory Experiences Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have shown that sexual and gender minorities experience oppression in terms of livelihood. Some research show that LGBTQ people experience discrimination, bullying, and harassment in the workplace, leading to sexuality-based marginalization (Compton 2020;Einarsdóttir, Hoel, and Lewis 2015;Speice 2020). Specifically, the study highlighted a bisexual woman who reported experiencing discrimination, exclusion, and bullying in her workplace after sharing her past story with a woman (Einarsdóttir et al 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%