1984
DOI: 10.1177/003452378403200105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The older the better? A study of mature student performance in British universities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above analysis supports the findings of previous research by Woodley (1984) and Hartley (1986) that mature students perform as well as traditional Alevel students at degree level. …”
Section: *F Is Not Significantp<001supporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above analysis supports the findings of previous research by Woodley (1984) and Hartley (1986) that mature students perform as well as traditional Alevel students at degree level. …”
Section: *F Is Not Significantp<001supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Lucas and Ward (1985); Smithers and Griffin (1986); Walker (1975); Woodley (1984) all found the best results in the 25 to 30 age group but differences began to appear between mature and younger students as the mature students increased in age. They also found that things become a little more difficult for students in their late 60s and 70s.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although more moderate results were found by Richardson (1995) and Trueman and Hartley (1996), mature students outperformed their younger peers in vocational subjects and languages (Johnes, 1992) and in arts and social science subjects (Walker, 1975). There are also gender differences, with female students outperforming male students (Woodley, 1984;Hoskins et al, 1997); both single and married mothers in higher education performed better academically than other students, including mature students in general (Burns et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Data discrepancies had to be verified, and deadlines were not always met as hoped for by the researcher. In the end, the variables identified were ones which are of considerable practical and theoretical interest, and have attracted previous attention in the research literature (Astin, Tsui, & Avalos, 1996;Hoskins & Newstead, 1997;Woodley, 1984).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%