2001
DOI: 10.1080/16184740108721890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Olympic Games and knowledge management: A case study of the Sydney organising committee of the Olympic Games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995;see also Cook & Brown, 1999;Nonaka, 1994), knowledge is created through continuous, dynamic interaction between tacit and explicit knowledge, what they refer to as the "knowledge creation spiral" that leads to four different forms of conversion The importance of knowledge as a source of added value or competitive advantage is widely accepted in the organization/management literature (e.g., Eisenhardt, & Santos, 2002;Grant, 1996;Nickerson, & Zenger, 2004), and has more recently become of some interest in the event and tourism literature (e.g., Cooper, 2006;Halbwirth & Toohey, 2001;Shaw & Williams, 2009;Stadler, Fullagar, & Reid, 2014;Yang & Wan, 2004), as well as the volunteering literature more generally (e.g., Lettieri, Borga, & Savoldelli, 2004;Liu & Ko, 2012). Articles published to date predominantly focus on the need for KM and an associated research agenda rather than offering suggestions on how to actually capture and/or use knowledge effectively.…”
Section: The Seci Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Nonaka and Takeuchi (1995;see also Cook & Brown, 1999;Nonaka, 1994), knowledge is created through continuous, dynamic interaction between tacit and explicit knowledge, what they refer to as the "knowledge creation spiral" that leads to four different forms of conversion The importance of knowledge as a source of added value or competitive advantage is widely accepted in the organization/management literature (e.g., Eisenhardt, & Santos, 2002;Grant, 1996;Nickerson, & Zenger, 2004), and has more recently become of some interest in the event and tourism literature (e.g., Cooper, 2006;Halbwirth & Toohey, 2001;Shaw & Williams, 2009;Stadler, Fullagar, & Reid, 2014;Yang & Wan, 2004), as well as the volunteering literature more generally (e.g., Lettieri, Borga, & Savoldelli, 2004;Liu & Ko, 2012). Articles published to date predominantly focus on the need for KM and an associated research agenda rather than offering suggestions on how to actually capture and/or use knowledge effectively.…”
Section: The Seci Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is this hope to plan, capture, and, potentially, reuse knowledge through volunteers in other contexts that makes the potential for a human capital legacy a KM matter (Dalkir, 2011;Hsu & Sabherwal, 2012;Seleim & Khalil, 2011). capital development (Benson, Dickson, Terwiel, & Blackman, 2014), growth in sports participation (Cashman, 2006;Chalip, 2006;, or knowledge management that may benefit future event organizing committees (Halbwirth & Toohey, 2001). This research gap is surprising considering (a) the number of volunteer positions involved (e.g., 25,000 in the Vancouver 2010 Games 1 and 70,000 at the London 2012 Games 2 ), and (b) the scale of the public and private investment to host these events ("Olympics cost B.C.…”
Section: Human Capital Legacy As a Knowledge Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3) Schenk et al (2015) has emphasized the importance of knowledge management in the sport events and has offered knowledge management model of Canada Games (7). Halbwirth and Toohey (2001) state that since people's cultures, countries' rules, and technological needs are different in the cities and countries hosting the Olympic games, the effective application of a knowledge management system is one of the critical needs of the organizing committees of the Olympic games. The organizing committee of the Sydney Olympic Games enjoyed such a system (2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, reviewing the related literature indicates that this issue has not been given due consideration in sport organizations (1). Sport organizations, just like other organizations, need to achieve success in acquiring, storing, sharing, managing, and controlling their organizational knowledge to reduce uncertainty about the results of their decisions and administrative procedures as well as coordinating and facilitating the execution of their goals and strategic measures (2). Workplace tools and structures that efficiently facilitate the sharing and creation of knowledge are important to the survival and growth of national sport organizations (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar expectation are placed on other international sporting events such as the Commonwealth Games. Applying knowledge management (KM) practices to sports event management can offer much needed support the multi-billion dollar industry growth (Halbwirth, 2001). Systematic handling of knowledge following an explicit framework underpins successful knowledge transfer and sharing (Heisig 2009, Sadrei et al 2007.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%