2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The oncological safety of nipple-sparing mastectomy – A Swedish matched cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

7
84
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
7
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table summarizes the published studies concerning the oncological safety of NSM with immediate breast reconstruction. The LRR is approximately 0%‐11% in most series . These results are similar to the rates of loco‐regional recurrence after skin‐sparing or conventional mastectomy .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Table summarizes the published studies concerning the oncological safety of NSM with immediate breast reconstruction. The LRR is approximately 0%‐11% in most series . These results are similar to the rates of loco‐regional recurrence after skin‐sparing or conventional mastectomy .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Limitations of this study include its retrospective nature, power, and follow‐up time. However, the number of patients (141) and breasts (211) undergoing NSM with available long‐term follow‐up data is comparable to previous studies examining oncologic safety with this relatively new procedure, which range from 67 to 370 patients and 69 to 645 breasts, respectively . Additionally, while other studies do not specifically address pathologic cancer stage, our proportion of patients undergoing mastectomy for therapeutic indication, with nodal disease, and with locally advanced disease compares favorably with other studies .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In addition to formal multi-disciplinary breast cancer care, all patients are now seen by subspecialty breast surgeons who occupy a common clinic facility with breast reconstructive surgeons. These factors, and the availability of robust data on the oncological safety of SSM and NSM in recent years, likely contributed to an increase in patients being referred for post-mastectomy reconstructions (3,(16)(17)(18). This parallels the observation that patients treated at specialized cancer centers, like those recognized by the National Cancer Institute in the USA, are reported to be 40% more likely to undergo reconstruction after mastectomy than patients treated at other institutions (19,20).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%