The optimal industrial carbon tax for China under carbon intensity constraints: a dynamic input–output optimization model

Abstract

To reduce carbon emissions, the Chinese government is considering introducing a differentiated industrial carbon tax on enterprises outside the carbon trading market in the future. An efficient carbon tax must consider not only how carbon taxes impact the current economy but also how the size of the tax should be adjusted across time due to external changes. To calculate the optimal industrial carbon tax for China which is subject to certain constraints, this paper investigates the economic and environmental effects of four possible industrial carbon tax rate models under carbon intensity constraints from 2021 to 2030 by a dynamic input–output optimization model. The results show that the dynamic tax rate model leads to larger fluctuations in GDP growth than the other tax models, with a low initial tax rate in the beginning and a high tax rate exceeding ¥180/t in 2030. Second, a large quantity of capital stock is distributed across the energy-intensive industries, which leads the existing capital investment structure to be path-dependent. This offsets the performance of carbon taxes. Third, indirect energy-intensive industries such as construction and transport are insensitive to the industrial carbon tax. Finally, comparing the impacts of the four tax rate models, the optimal industrial carbon tax for China is found to be a fixed differentiated tax rate, in which energy-intensive sectors are taxed ¥75/t and low-carbon sectors are taxed ¥50/t. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11356-022-19162-6.

The Inhibition and Equilibrium of Policy Effectiveness of the Low-Carbon Economy: Evidence from Liaoning Province of China

“…Furthermore, high-carbon products should be taxed at all stages, including the development stage, the production and processing stage, the sales stage, and the recycling stage, so as to limit the development of a high-carbon economy to the greatest extent. On the other hand, a carbon tax should be set up [40]. A carbon tax is a tax specifically for carbon emissions, which can promote the development of the clean energy industry.…”

Analysis of the impact of differentiated carbon tax policies on shore power technology selection by port and shipping enterprise

“…With shipping accounting for about 80% of global trade transportation and 2.89% of global greenhouse gas emissions, there is an urgent need to reduce carbon emissions from the shipping industry [1].Lately, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) has been considering the possibility of introducing a global shipping carbon tax, which would be levied based on a ship's carbon emissions, with the proceeds supporting the development of low-carbon technologies [2].But a harmonized carbon tax policy could have a negative impact on smaller shipping enterprises that are less resilient to external risks, meanwhile potentially reducing the overall capacity of the global shipping market [3].In contrast, a differentiated carbon tax policy could target different ports and shipping enterprises, thereby reducing greenhouse gas emissions more effectively, meanwhile taking into account economic efficiency, fairness and industry competitiveness [4], [5].In practice, some countries and regions have begun to explore and implement differentiated carbon tax policies. For example, the use of low-carbon or carbon-free fuels is encouraged through the imposition of carbon taxes at different rates on ships using different types of fuels; or tax incentives or subsidies are provided for ships and ports adopting energy-efficient technologies and operational optimization to reward their efforts to reduce emissions [6].For the purpose of reducing the pollution to the environment caused by power generation from moored ships, more and more experts and scholars have begun to advocate shutting down the auxiliary engines of the ships and connecting the ships with the shore power grid to get power while moored, i.e., utilizing the shore power to generate electricity [7], [8].However, some ports and shipping enterprises are reluctant to adopt shore power due to its high construction and operating costs.…”

Unregulated Cap-and-Trade Model for Sustainable Supply Chain Management

“…Recently, several studies focused on how to optimize incentives to lower emissions in a given time frame. The optimization of a carbon tax is studied by [16], where the maximization of GDP is considered while carbon intensity is constrained. Carbon tax and tax allocation are studied by [17] in a non-linear model where aggregate values are considered for all country industries.…”