2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.10.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The optimal MBR configuration: Hybrid versus stand-alone — Comparison between three full-scale MBRs treating municipal wastewater

Abstract: Construction or modernization of a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) with membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology requires selection of optimal configuration and design. The objective of this paper is to evaluate a hybrid MBR, i.e., a combination of a conventional activated sludge (CAS) process and an MBR, in comparison to a stand-alone MBR. This paper evaluates two different hybrid MBR configurations and a stand-alone MBR. The impact of these MBR configurations on operation, performance, energy consumption and e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, industrial wastewater has a higher organic load than ordinary municipal wastewater, and the use of a single MBR process to treat this type of wastewater is energy intensive; therefore, a combined process can reduce the energy cost during process operation. For example, the average specific energy consumption of the combined conventional activated sludge (CAS) and MBR system is 0.6 kWh/m 3 and can be as low as 0.76 kWh/m 3 for the up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Bioreactor (UASB) and MBR process [ 19 ], while the specific energy consumption of the single-stage MBR process is 1.1 kWh/m 3 , which is higher than that of the combined processes [ 21 ]. Furthermore, SBR pre-treatment is necessary for the process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, industrial wastewater has a higher organic load than ordinary municipal wastewater, and the use of a single MBR process to treat this type of wastewater is energy intensive; therefore, a combined process can reduce the energy cost during process operation. For example, the average specific energy consumption of the combined conventional activated sludge (CAS) and MBR system is 0.6 kWh/m 3 and can be as low as 0.76 kWh/m 3 for the up-flow Anaerobic Sludge Bioreactor (UASB) and MBR process [ 19 ], while the specific energy consumption of the single-stage MBR process is 1.1 kWh/m 3 , which is higher than that of the combined processes [ 21 ]. Furthermore, SBR pre-treatment is necessary for the process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If filterability, with its dynamic changes, is properly evaluated, the process operation can be optimized. Furthermore, the DFCm can be useful to research how filterability can be influenced by, as follows: MBR configuration [ 17 ]; MBR design, in particular hydraulic retention time [ 18 ] and recirculation [ 19 ]; membrane configurations [ 18 , 20 ]; wastewater influent characteristics [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]; activated sludge characteristics, such as temperature [ 18 , 21 ], mixed liquid suspended solids [ 18 , 23 ], viscosity [ 24 ], floc size [ 19 ], soluble organic fractions [ 18 ], sludge morphology and relative hydrophobicity [ 25 ]; operational parameters, such as sludge retention time [ 18 , 26 ], food to mass ratio [ 18 ], substrate addition [ 27 ], and dissolved oxygen concentrations [ 28 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process design, the water in the mouth is changed to submerged outflow, reducing the head loss of the pipeline and the sewage lifting height [182]. In addition, due to the water inflow of the sewage plant changing with time and seasonal fluctuations, most of the time, the pumps cannot be operated efficiently, so the use of a variable frequency drive water pump is a very effective way to save energy [183].…”
Section: Conclusion and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%