2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1423-0410.2003.00357.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The origin and identification of unknown events associated with low‐level leucocyte counting by flow cytometry

Abstract: These previously unidentified events are probably fragmented nuclei or free DNA originating from PMN owing to a combination of ageing and reagent addition. Currently, in our protocols, the region used for WBC enumeration counts intact WBC nuclei. To achieve WBC counting consistency, flow cytometric gating protocols must be standardized, and a decision taken as to whether to include extraregional events in the count.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Bashir et al [14], we did not observe much extra-regional events in flow cytometry in our series. Thus, we do not think that such events led to false concentrations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to Bashir et al [14], we did not observe much extra-regional events in flow cytometry in our series. Thus, we do not think that such events led to false concentrations.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…We then evaluated the in vitro quality of these components, comparing them against local, national, and European specifications for blood component quality. In addition, as it is known that longer storage times at ambient temperature provide a greater challenge to leukodepletion filters, 12,13 we used two different integral leukodepletion filters for RBC.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several reports have indicated that an increased storage time of products before leukoreduction increases the amount of WBC fragments and cell-free DNA that ends up in the LR products 5,[21][22][23][24][25][26] and may lead to inaccurate estimates of WBC levels after leukoreduction. Although van der Meer and colleagues 26 determined that weak PI-positive events might contribute to overestimates of intact WBCs, they did not observe these in whole-blood units or buffy-coat process RBC components before 12 hours after collection with either the BD Biosciences LeucoCOUNT or LeukoSure methods on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a number of manual and automated methods for assessing residual WBC (rWBC) counts in leukoreduced (LR) blood components. These include enumeration of white blood cells (WBCs) by flow cytometry, 1‐6 microvolume fluorometry (IMAGN 2000, BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA), 1‐3,6 and Nageotte hemocytometer and microscopy 1,3,4,6 . Enumeration performed by flow cytometry has been performed predominantly on commercially available cytometers (FACScan or FACSCalibur, BD Biosciences; 1‐3,5 or EPICS XL, Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA 2‐4 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation