Extracorporeal Shock Waves in Orthopaedics 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-80427-4_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Orthopaedic Shock Wave Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Insertion Tendopathy and Tendinosis Calcarea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, only 24 articles describing 1,585 patients (33%) satisfied their standards of an adequate scientific evaluation and only 978 (20%) involved their Type A or B study classification. Haist et al 22 and Haupt" reviewed the emerging musculoskeletal applications of extracorporeal shockwaves. Both articles supported the apparent positive results from shockwave therapy, while stressing the need for additional clinical outcome studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, only 24 articles describing 1,585 patients (33%) satisfied their standards of an adequate scientific evaluation and only 978 (20%) involved their Type A or B study classification. Haist et al 22 and Haupt" reviewed the emerging musculoskeletal applications of extracorporeal shockwaves. Both articles supported the apparent positive results from shockwave therapy, while stressing the need for additional clinical outcome studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20 The technology has been used in Europe for approximately 10 years for the treatment of numerous muscu loskeletal cond itions. 4,10-14, 18,19,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28]31,36,46,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58]63,71 The emphasis has been on clinical applications, without a great deal of experimental evaluation of the specific mechanisms of shockwave action on different musculoskeletal tissues or contiguous neurovascular structures. Many of the published clinical studies lack significant data generation parameters that would allow credible outcome analysis.…”
Section: Table 1: Outcome Study Selection Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Germany, where the therapy was developed, over 65 000 treatments using ESWT are given annually for musculoskeletal complaints. [1][2][3][4][5] The rationales proposed for the use of the technique in such conditions include the promotion of soft-tissue healing, 7 reduction of calcification, 4 inhibition of pain receptors 6 or denervation to achieve relief from pain. 5 In spite of the enthusiasm for its use in musculoskeletal conditions there has been no randomised, controlled trial to evaluate the effect of ESWT in specific conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] The theoretical benefits are the stimulation of tissue healing and the breakdown of calcification. [4][5][6][7] In spite of the increasing popularity of this method of treatment, there has been no randomised, controlled trial of its use in specific musculoskeletal conditions. Benefit from ESWT has been demonstrated in calcific tendonitis of the rotator cuff.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%